Department of the Treasury


Community
Development
Financial
Institutions
Fund

Fiscal Year 1997
Annual Report

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents 

 

 

Vision and Mission Statements 5

Message from the Director 7

Message from the Chief Financial Officer 9

Executive Summary and Highlights 11

Organizational Profile 13

Program Discussion and Analysis 17

Financial Discussion and Analysis 29

Reports from the Auditors 35

Financial Statements 48

Notes to the Financial Statements 52

Appendices 61

Management Officials and Advisory Board Members 75

 

 

 

 

Vision 

Implement a new direction for community development initiatives, by using limited public resources to invest in and build the capacity of the private sector to address the community development financing needs of distressed communities and disadvantaged populations. This will:

 

 

Mission 

Promote economic revitalization and community development through investment in and assistance to community development financial institutions (CDFIs) and through encouraging insured depository institutions to increase lending, financial services and technical assistance within distressed communities and to invest in CDFIs.

 

 

 

Message from the Director 

 

The Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 created a Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund to promote economic revitalization and community development through investment in and assistance to community development financial institutions. Our activities are intended to provide greater access to capital for urban, rural, and Native American communities that face serious social and economic problems.

The institutions we support make a difference in communities all across the country. Our funds are used to leverage substantial private sector dollars into these communities and create replicable models for poverty alleviation through economic growth. Investment in businesses, housing, commercial real estate, human development, and urban activities that promote long-term economic and social viability are critical to our well being as a country. As a result of the Fund’s investments in institutions serving the underserved, we make economic independence a reality for many more people.

The Fund faced many challenges as it established itself, developing policy and programs with limited staff. Through the end of fiscal year 1997, the Fund has made 79 awards totaling over $75 million to CDFIs across the country, and 92 awards totaling $30 million to banks and thrifts for their efforts in providing creative loans, financial assistance and investments in distressed communities. In January 1997, the Fund managed the first Presidential Awards for Excellence in Microenterprise Development.

As the Fund has evolved so has its staff. In November 1997, Paul Gentille joined our staff as our Deputy Director for Management and CFO. Paul has had a long career in the Federal Government and brings much experience to his role. Our counsel, Maurice Jones, has recently become Deputy Director for Policy and Programs.

In January 1998, I joined the Fund as its second Director. I have a long-term commitment to community development and our basic operating premise — that small amounts of federal dollars can stimulate significant private sector investment in poor communities. We are currently building our team and organizational structure, and plan to have a full staff on board by the end of the fiscal year. Working with our two Deputy Directors will be a cadre of professionals, able to implement our programs prudently and think creatively, as we move forward to further our mission.

The CDFI industry faces many challenges as it grows and strives to increase its impact. I believe the Fund will facilitate that growth through training and technical assistance initiatives beginning later this year. We will also study the impact of the Fund’s investments and engage the community development field through a variety of outreach and communications efforts.

I look forward to building our staff, growing our programs, and ensuring the taxpayer’s investment in the Fund catalyzes significant economic activity in distressed communities.

Ellen W. Lazar
Director

 

 

Message from the CFO 

 

As CFO and a part of a newly appointed management team, I am very pleased to present the fiscal years 1997, 1996 and 1995 audited financial statements for the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.

These statements, representing the Fund's first efforts to prepare stand-alone financial statements, were audited by KPMG Peat Marwick LLP, and their audit resulted in an unqualified opinion for the Fund. What appeared impossible a few months ago, became a reality through the tireless efforts of a small, but extremely dedicated staff. To them I give a special thank you!

This opinion, along with the auditor's recommendations, now establishes a benchmark for the Fund's financial management and awards administration and monitoring. With a vision towards working better and costing less, the Fund's financial and program personnel will work together in partnership to further strengthen the Fund's management accountability and controls. Together we will ensure the integrity of information, make decisions, and measure performance to achieve desirable outcomes and real cost effectiveness.

We are firmly committed to excellence in all aspects of financial management and awards administration and monitoring. With the addition of new staff, we will focus on attaining a new level of efficiency and quality in the Fund's awards management, with emphasis on quality and customer service. Communicating with applicants and award recipients through the Internet and a CDFI Fund web site will be a priority during fiscal year 1998. We will also strive to have readily available reliable information on the Fund's financial condition, operations and awards programs as well as the performance and costs of these activities. Using a results-oriented management approach, we will enhance our strategic planning process, establish performance measures focused on "outcomes," and link performance information to resource requirements through annual performance plans.

Faced with the many challenges associated with a new and growing organization, our new management team is promoting a forward thinking approach to meet our future challenges and commitments. We are promoting a strong partnership between the Fund's program and management staffs, recognizing that our customers and employees are the most important resources for planning and decision-making processes inherent in carrying out our mission. At the end of each day, our commitment to the sound stewardship of the Fund's financial resources will remain our highest priority.

Paul R. Gentille
Deputy Director for Management
and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Executive Summary 

The Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund is working to expand access to credit and financial services in poor urban, rural and Native American communities, where one of the biggest obstacles to economic development is a lack of access to mainstream sources of private sector capital. Access to capital is an essential ingredient for creating and retaining jobs, developing affordable housing, revitalizing neighborhoods, and building local economies.

The CDFI Fund represents a new direction for community development initiatives by leveraging limited public resources to invest in and build the capacity of private sector institutions to finance community development needs in distressed communities.

In only two years, the CDFI Fund has made a significant contribution to increasing access to private sector capital, effectively promoting partnerships between community based financial institutions, banks and other private sector players, and leveraging scarce Federal resources into private dollars for credit starved communities.

Currently operating three programs - the CDFI Program, the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program, and the Microenterprise Program - the Fund is helping to create jobs, rebuild neighborhoods, and restore hope in communities across the nation.

 

  Highlights

 

 

Organizational Profile 

The Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund was authorized as part of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994. In July of 1995, CDFI Fund, a wholly owned government corporation, was placed within the Department of the Treasury.

Organization Chart

The offices of the CDFI Fund are located in Washington, D.C., where major policies and programs are developed and implemented in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The Fund executive structure consists of a Director, Deputy Director for Policy and Programs, Deputy Director for Management/Chief Financial Officer, Legal Counsel and External Affairs Officer.

The Office of Management includes the functions of Awards Administration and Monitoring, Financial Management and Administrative Services. The Office of Policy and Programs includes the CDFI Program, BEA Program, Technical Assistance, Training and Other Programs, and Policy and Research.

The CDFI Fund Advisory Board consists of 15 members. Membership includes the Secretary or designee of the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, and Treasury; the Administrator or designee of the Small Business Administration; and nine private citizens, appointed by the President.

 

Funding Summary

Sources of Funds

Since the first period of operation in FY 1995, the Fund has received annual appropriations of $50 million for FY 1995, $45 million for FY 1996, $50 million for FY 1997, and $80 million for FY 1998. The appropriations have two-year obligation authority, therefore the total budget authority available for use by the CDFI Fund in FY 1997 was $95 million, which included $45 million carried over from FY 1996.

Of the amounts appropriated to the Fund, not more than $5,550,000 may be used by the Fund in each fiscal year to pay the administrative costs and expenses of the Fund.

 

 

Uses of Funds

The CDFI Fund incurred obligations of $59.5 million during FY 1997. Of that amount $5.5 million was obligated for the Fund's administrative and management expenses.

 

 

Program Discussion 

and Analysis 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Delaware Valley
Community Reinvestment Fund
Phildelphia, Pennsylvania

 

A national leader in developing innovative strategies to serve and stabilize disinvested communities, Deleware Valley Community Reinvestment Fund serves the most distressed neighborhoods in Camden, New Jersey, and Philadelphia and Chester, Pennsylvania. With its strong track record of financing affordable housing and small businesses, this CDFI’s asset base has grown 25% in the past year to $21 million and has attracted more than 700 investors from the private, non-profit, and public sectors. The $2 million investment by the CDFI Fund will be used to significantly expand the total number and dollar amount of Delaware Valley’s lending and investment activities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appalbanc
Berea, Kentucky

 

A multifaceted CDFI that serves 85 extremely distressed counties in West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, and Virginia, Appalbanc has developed an effective strategy to promote housing development and homeownership. Since its inception, Appalbanc and its affiliates have financed the development or rehabilitation of more than 20,000 homes. The $1.33 million in assistance provided by the CDFI Fund will be used to expand Appalbanc’s activities in this very needy region.

 

 

 

 

 

 

First American
Credit Union
Window Rock, Arizona

 

Activities which serve Native American reservations throughout Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah illustrate how the CDFI Fund’s resources will generate economic activity in under-served communities. The basic financial services provided by the credit union include checking and savings accounts and consumer and home improvement loans for people who otherwise would have no access to these services. The Fund’s assistance will be used to expand lending and introduce ATM services to rural, sparsely settled low-income communities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Community
Capital Bank

Brooklyn, New York

 

Community Capital Bank provides business, housing, and commercial loans to projects in distressed communities throughout New York City. In the first six months of 1996, Community Capital Bank provided nearly $2.6 million in loans for small business development and affordable housing construction and support for entrepreneurial development initiatives among public housing residents. Community Capital Bank was awarded $215,461 for increasing its lending activities during this period.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Central Bank
of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri

 

Central Bank was awarded $99,869 for increasing its deposit-taking activities and consumer and commercial real estate, housing, and business loans in distressed neighborhoods. During the first six months of 1996, this bank provided more than $8.3 million in loans and services. In addition to facilitating neighborhood redevelopment through its single- and multi-family housing activities, the bank made a significant loan to help a major manufacturer and employer remain in the community.

 

During FY 1997, the Fund continued to operate two key programs: the Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Program and the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program. In addition, the Microenterprise Program, a non-monetary award program inaugurated in FY 1996 was continued.

 

Community Development

Financial Institutions Program

 

The CDFI Fund makes investments in and provides technical assistance to Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs). The Fund seeks to enhance the capacity of CDFIs to address unmet community development finance needs in distressed communities.

 

CDFIs are private for-profit and non-profit financial institutions with community development as their primary mission and include community development banks, community development credit unions, non-profit loan funds, microenterprise loan funds, and community development venture capital funds.

 

The CDFI Fund may provide financial assistance in the form of equity investments, grants, loans, or deposits. The Fund may also provide technical assistance. All financial assistance provided by the Fund must be matched on at least a one-to-one basis with funds from sources other than the Federal government. Matching funds must be at least comparable in form and value to the assistance provided by the Fund.

 

Generally, assistance from the Fund is used to build each institution’s capacity and expand its lending, investment, or other community development activities.

 

Institutions seeking assistance submit an application to the Fund, which includes a comprehensive business plan covering not less than five years. Applicants are awarded assistance on a competitive basis, with selection criteria that includes the quality of their business plan, the extent and nature of community development impact, and the applicant's management team experience and background.

 

Organizations selected for an award enter into an Assistance Agreement with the Fund, which includes performance goals based on their comprehensive business plan.

 

The CDFI Fund’s ability to leverage private sector funds into distressed communities is dramatic. The $37.2 million in assistance awarded to CDFIs in the first round (FY 1996) will leverage approximately three to four times that amount in new capital over the next several years and generate approximately $400 million in new community development activity over the next decade.

 

For the 31 institutions funded in the first round of the Program, more than $50 million of matching money from non-Federal sources was raised. Seventy-two percent of these institutions derived all of their matching funds from private sources (such as banks, corporations, foundations, and individuals). Nineteen percent of the institutions raised between 70% and 99% of the matching funds from private sources. Only three institutions raised less than 70% of their matching monies from private sources.

 

Unlike programs in which resources are provided for specific projects, under the CDFI Program, the Fund invests in CDFIs as institutions in order to promote the long-term viability of these financial institutions to serve distressed communities.

 

Bank Enterprise Award Program

 

The BEA Program provides awards to insured depository institutions that increase their financial support of CDFIs and their lending and services in distressed neighborhoods. Awards are determined on the basis of the total dollar value of increased activity within an evaluation period. Award amounts range from 5 to 15 percent of the dollar value of the increased activity, depending on the type of activity. Awards are made after activities have been successfully implemented.

 

Eligible institutions submit applications to the CDFI Fund, which selects awardees based on various criteria, including: the activity in which they propose to engage and the total dollar amount of new activity generated during an evaluation period. Eligible activities include providing financial or technical assistance to CDFIs, as well as lending, financial or other services in neighborhoods with a poverty rate of at least 30 percent and an unemployment rate that is at least one and one half times the national average.

 

Applicants that are competitive and successful in undertaking their proposed activities will receive an award after their activities have been completed.

 

In 1996, the Fund made a total of $13.1 million in awards which leveraged nearly $66 million of private sector money for the benefit of 49 CDFIs--as well as generated $60 million in new lending and financial services targeted to some of the nation’s most distressed neighborhoods.

 

In 1996, 38 institutions, based in 18 states and the District of Columbia, received awards in the first funding round. These institutions include a wide range of financial institutions--including national banks, state-chartered commercial banks, federal savings banks, and thrifts--ranging in asset size from $21 million to more than $320 billion.

 

In 1997, 54 insured depository institutions were selected to receive a total of $16.5 million in grants. These institutions were headquartered in 17 states and the District of Columbia, with activities reaching many more communities across the nation.

 

Microenterprise Award Program

 

The Presidential Awards for Excellence in Microenterprise Development reflect an on-going commitment by the Administration to advance the role that microenterprise development plays in enhancing economic opportunities for all Americans, especially those who have lacked access to traditional sources of credit such as women, low income people, and minorities. By recognizing outstanding microenterprise organizations, these non-monetary awards bring wider public attention to the important role and successes of microenterprise development in the domestic economy.

 

Winners of Presidential Awards were selected through a rigorous two-stage review process. A key element of the review process was involvement of a team of 20 nationally recognized experts on microenterprise from the public, private and non-profit sectors. The evaluations, advice, and recommendations of these experts helped the Fund select the first round award winners.

 

 

Program Measures and Statistics

 

BETHEX FEDERAL
CREDIT UNION
Bronx, New York

The Borrower

Ms. Lamont has a home-based business—"Full Potential"—designing and manufacturing high-fashion hats. Over the past eighteen months Ms. Lamont has seen a significant increase in business culminating in a contract with the national clothing retailer, J. Crew. In 1997, Ms. Lamont approached Bethex for a $15,000 working capital loan to purchase supplies to meet the obligations of the contract with J. Crew. After only three years of operations, she had proven to be a successful self-made entrepreneur, but now needed help to meet her contractual obligations and for the business to reach its next level of growth. Ms. Lamont enrolled in an entrepreneurial training class and subsequently applied for a loan with Bethex. Bethex was impressed with the thoroughness of Ms. Lamont’s business plan, her well organized business records and excellent credit history. As a result, the loan was granted.

One of the short term marketing goals outlined in the business plan was to show her merchandise, in-person, at a major retail store—what is known as a "trunk show." In October, 1997 that goal was realized through a trunk show at Bloomingdales in New York City. Without the success of the J. Crew contract, which was able to be honored through the loan from Bethex, an invitation to that show would not likely have happened. Ms. Lamont now has four seasonal employees in her burgeoning millinery operation.

Bethex FCU

The South Bronx is one of the country’s most distressed communities. Despite the area’s troubles, Bethex Federal Credit Union has been a steady and constant source of credit, and more importantly of hope, for hundreds of low-income families. Founded in 1970 by welfare recipients, Bethex serves these low-income residents who have generally lacked access to conventional banking services. Over time, Bethex has grown from a institution that provided only the most basic financial services: savings accounts, very small loans and selling money orders, into a full-service financial institution now making business loans of up to $15,000.

The South Bronx contains some of the highest concentrations of poverty in the New York City metropolitan area, as well as the country. The typical family income is approximately one-third of the median family income for the New York City area. Bethex’ service area and its membership is heavily (approximately 60%) Hispanic, primarily of Puerto Rican and Dominican background. African Americans comprise about 40% of its membership. For residents of the South Bronx, the general absence of conventional financial services has been filled, in part, by other sources of "credit" with extraordinary interest rates, including pawn shops and loan sharks.

The CDFI Fund Award

Bethex received a $100,000 grant from the CDFI Fund to expand its financial services and increase its business lending. Since the Fund’s investment, Bethex has been able to granting more loans, larger loans and accept more risk in its lending. Over the past 18 months Bethex’ membership has grown from 1,270 to 3,000, and its assets have increased from $1.6 million to $3 million. The increase in membership is a result of the expansion of financial services—Bethex now offers ATM cards, direct deposit and checking accounts.

In addition, over the last year, Bethex has launched a "School Banking" program. This program encourages savings among the youth of the community and is an important tool for teaching money management skills. Once common in New York City public schools, this program has not been as frequently utilized in recent years. Currently, Bethex has 550 "school accounts" from third, fourth and fifth graders at two public schools located in the Bronx.

Joy Cousminer, Treasurer/
Manager of Bethex, notes that receiving the award from the CDFI Fund "has made us famous." Since Bethex received their award many commercial banks and thrifts have made non-member deposits and have offered a variety of technical support to the credit union.

 

 

 

ACCION TEXAS
San Antonio, Texas

The Borrower

Andrew Fuentes was too ill to return to his construction job and his family’s money was dwindling. At his wife’s suggestion, he made a table and set of chairs for their empty kitchen out of some old wood. This project, which had a unique, hand hewn look, made Andrew realize his creative potential. Soon afterward, he was selling his "blue fence" furniture to friends and began making furniture full-time. Andrew approached several local banks for a loan, but was turned down because of his credit history. By the time he heard about ACCION Texas, Andrew was too discouraged to apply for a loan. Andrew’s wife encouraged him. "Let’s try it!" she said. But Andrew declined fearing his request would be rejected. Eventually, he applied for and received a loan from ACCION Texas. He used the $3,000 loan to buy more inventory. He filled his shop with furniture and his sales doubled. "Without ACCION," Andrew stated, "we never could have made it."

ACCION Texas

The decision to launch ACCION Texas was based on a 1993 market study carried out by ACCION International of San Antonio’s Westside micro- and small business sector. The survey of 120 microentrepreneurs included owners of small restaurants and grocery stores, plumbers, electricians, painters, seamstresses, jewelry-makers, house cleaners, home day-care providers, and flea market vendors. These icroentrepreneurs expressed a need for credit, but were unable to access traditional financing. ACCION Texas was created to give these entrepreneurs access to financing and to other business support services. Of the San Antonio Westside micro-business owners surveyed, 83% had never tried to obtain a bank loan and only 2% had used a bank loan to finance their businesses. Many believed that they could not offer sufficient collateral, business history, or income to secure a loan. Of the 80% who said that their businesses were not operating to their potential, 77% cited "lack of capital" as the primary constraint. Approximately 70% of ACCION Texas’ borrowers are Mexican-American and have businesses located in San Antonio’s low-income neighborhoods. ACCION Texas offers microloans from $500 to $25,000—with an average loan size of $3,100—and technical assistance to borrowers.

The CDFI Fund Award

A $500,000 grant from the CDFI Fund is assisting this CDFI in its efforts to expand service to more than 1,500 borrowers through loans totaling over $3.8 million over a five year period. The grant will also enable ACCION Texas to strengthen its organizational performance.

Since 1994, ACCION Texas has made 817 loans to 331 business owners totaling more than $2.5 million. A study of ACCION Texas’ borrowers found that the 25 clients who had received at least four loans from the program had experienced a 49-percent average increase in the dollar value of the their business assets from $7,971 to $11,870. Their monthly business profits increased an average of 55-percent and their take-home incomes increased 16%.

 

SANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY
CREDIT UNION

Santa Cruz, California

 

The Borrowers

With a $1 million grant from the CDFI Fund, the Santa Cruz Community Credit Union has opened a new branch office serving the low-income population of Watsonville, California. Eleven percent of the total population and twenty-one percent of the children live below the poverty line in Watsonville. The opening of this new branch has extended needed financial services into the Watsonville community, a major agricultural area whose population is approximately 60% Hispanic. Prior to the opening of the new branch, Watsonville residents had limited access to the full-range of financial services now offered by Santa Cruz Community Credit Union.

Of note are two loans that have been made in Watsonville to address the critical needs of the community’s at-risk youth. Santa Cruz Community Credit Union provided a $160,000 loan to the Santa Cruz Community Counseling Center (the Community Center) enabling it to secure a counseling facility located right in downtown Watsonville. Prior to the Watsonville location, the Counseling Center’s nearest facility was approximately 15 miles away. The Counseling Center’s new Watsonville facility has provided greater accessibility to needed counseling services for the youth and families of Watsonville and now has a greater presence in the community.

In addition, Santa Cruz Community Credit Union has made a loan of almost $800,000 to nationally acclaimed Hispanic nonprofit organization that serves Santa Cruz County youth, focusing particularly on the Hispanic population and stopping gang-related violence. Santa Cruz Community Credit Union’s loan allowed this community based organization to consolidate their three geographically scattered facilities into one with room for future expansion. The nonprofit is a highly successful organization that uses, among other techniques, peer groups and working on the streets to reach youth that are most at-risk.

Santa Cruz Community Credit Union

Since its inception in 1977, Santa Cruz Community Credit Union has achieved a remarkable track record as a full-service community development financial institution. It has attracted over 6,300 members and has increased its assets to $28 million.

Santa Cruz Community Credit Union offers its members a wide variety of services (savings, checking, credit cards, ATMs, telephone banking) and a range of lending products (consumer loans, real estate loans and business loans). A special lending focus is agricultural loans to support farm operations that employ environmentally sensitive practices such as integrated pest management techniques or sustainable organic growing practices.

The CDFI Fund Award

A $1 million grant from the CDFI Fund has provided the Santa Cruz Community Credit Union with the capital it needed to implement its plans for a significant expansion – the new branch office in Watsonville.

Santa Cruz Community Credit Union has become a pre-eminent credit union in providing small business loans. To date, it has lent over $37 million to small businesses, cooperatives, and nonprofit service providers – generally entities that could not otherwise access loans from traditional sources. It has provided approximately $4 million in small business and nonprofit loans annually, and over 220 such loans are currently on its books. Over 70% of these loans have been made to minorities and women.

 

 

SELF-HELP

Durham, North Carolina

Impact on Housing

Self-Help’s ability to leverage the CDFI Fund investment is noteworthy. The $3 million was used, in part, to leverage the purchase of affordable single-family mortgage loans from a North Carolina commercial bank. During the last year, this type of transaction was duplicated seven times with three banks, BB&T, Centura Bank, and First Union. Additional capital for these transactions was borrowed from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, including $33 million in 1997 alone. Another $11 million was borrowed from banks through incentives from the BEA Program. The purchases of these mortgage pools have so far totaled $103 million and include 1,820 underlying mortgages. The average income of the homebuyers in these mortgage pools is 60% of the area median family income. (More than 55% of these homeowners live in rural areas, and 29% are minority.) Further, the capital the banks gain from the sale of mortgages is being used to make additional home purchase loans to lower-income families. With Self-Help’s demonstrated success, the CDFI is now in a position to open doors to the national capital markets to accelerate the flow of dollars available for achieving home ownership for North Carolina’s low-wealth families.

The increase in Self-Help’s asset base has also allowed for a 30% increase, over 1996 levels, in its small businesses and community facilities lending. A few loans that added particular community building value include: a loan to an African American property owner in Pittsboro to build a facility that is leased to a church-sponsored daycare center; a $250,000 loan to build a facility for a new charter school in Kingston; and a loan to an entrepreneur to finance a manufacturing business that converts recycled wood waste (from area mills) into fiber board that in turn is used in the production of doors purchased by building suppliers.

Self-Help

Self-Help, launched in 1980, aggregates resources and forges partnerships with the public and private sectors and advocates for community development issues. Self Help’s two financing entities, Self-Help Credit Union and Self-Help Ventures Fund, provide access to credit for North Carolina’s distressed communities and low-wealth families. Self-Help Ventures Fund provides loans to emerging small businesses, provides management assistance to its commercial borrowers, and helps expand housing opportunities and community facilities. Self-Help’s steady growth and increased demand has allowed the this CDFI to open five regional offices in the state. Self-Help’s partnerships engages it in increasingly sophisticated transactions and leveraging strategies. Self-Help’s work is having significant impact in transforming conventional loan underwriting standards and, in particular, in creating increased opportunities for home ownership among the state’s lower income families.

The CDFI Fund’s Investment in Self-Help:

The CDFI Fund’s $3 million grant was channeled to Self-Help Ventures Fund and helped to boost its equity capital and assisted it in expanding its secondary market initiatives. Beginning with Wachovia Bank, Self-Help has pioneered a means to create a continual flow of capital to provide mortgages for low-income homebuyers. Self-Help has expanded its asset base from $94 million in September 1996 to $140 million at the close of 1997.

Republic National Bank
of New York

New York, New York

Reinvesting in Communities

Republic National Bank of New York (Republic), which was awarded $519,659 in the first round of the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program, is an avid proponent of investing in distressed communities and the community development financial institutions (CDFIs) which serve them. Republic has used all of its award to leverage an additional $5 million in economic development and small business lending in low- and moderate-income communities. In this way, its BEA award will be leveraged nearly 10 times over in the form of new lending. The award dollars have been used to create the Special Economic Development Fund which provides below market rates and create a loan loss reserve for loans Republic will make to non-profit economic development organizations over the next few years. Two examples are:

Republic National Bank

Republic National Bank of New York is a full service bank, which is based in and serves New York and South Florida.

The CDFI Fund Award

Republic was awarded $519,659 under the BEA Program for providing loans and operating grants totaling $5,196,592 to 21 community development organizations. The institutions assisted by Republic range in size, products and service areas: the Local Initiatives Support Corporation, mentioned above, has a national service area; the Enterprise Foundation (a certified CDFI and a 1997 CDFI Program awardee), based in Columbia, Maryland, which provides loans and technical assistance to nonprofit developers of affordable housing serving distressed areas of 16 cities across the nation; and Bethex Federal Credit Union (a certified CDFI and a 1996 CDFI Program awardee), a full-service credit union serving the low-income residents of the South Bronx, New York.

 

 

 

 

 

Bank of America Community Development Bank

Walnut Creek, California

Reinvesting in Communities

In addition to significantly increasing its lending activity in eligible distressed neighborhoods—activity that qualified it for an award of $1,585,510 under the first round of the Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program in 1996—the Bank of America (B of A) Community Development Bank, together with Bank of America, F.S.B., has invested its entire combined Bank Enterprise Award back into the community. $1.1 million of the award money has been used to establish the Bank of America Leadership Academy, a nine-month program that provides training for senior management of community development organizations. The B of A Leadership Academy is funded jointly by Bank of America Community Development Bank, Bank of America, F.S.B., and the Local Initiatives Support Corporation (a certified CDFI and a 1996 CDFI Program awardee); and is conducted by the Development Training Institute. The B of A Leadership Academy is funded for three nine-month programs. Each session trains 35 executive directors or senior staff of community-based development organizations that are at least five years old and have completed at least three projects.

An additional 20 percent of the combined awards will go to the Low Income Housing Fund, a certified CDFI and a 1996 CDFI Program awardee which provides loans for very low-income housing development across the country.

 

The Bank of America Community Development Bank

The Bank of America Community Development Bank is based in Walnut Creek, California and has a service area that includes the entire State of California. The bank provides a range of lending products, including multi-family housing, commercial real estate, and business loans.

The CDFI Fund Award

The B of A Community Development Bank was awarded $1,585,510 in the 1996 funding round for increasing its multi-family housing, commercial real estate and business loans in distressed communities across California. The Bank made nearly $25 million in loans in targeted neighborhoods meeting the BEA Program’s distress criteria, including $9.5 million in commercial real estate loans, $13.2 million in multifamily loans, and $2.2 million in business loans. The Bank projects that these loans will generate more than 185 units of affordable housing and 300 jobs. The Bank’s increased multifamily lending activity has helped provide a vital source of affordable housing for low-income families in targeted neighborhoods in San Francisco, Modesto, and Los Angeles, including the projects described below:

 

 Financial Discussion

 and Analysis 

Financial Management Systems

The CDFI Fund's financial statements included in this annual report represent the first stand alone statements prepared by the Fund since its inception in FY 1995. Prior to this report, financial information for the CDFI Fund had been included as part of the Department of the Treasury's annual Accountability Report for FY 1996.

Since the beginning of the Fund, accounting services and financial statement preparation have been performed outside of the Fund in other Treasury offices. Until mid FY 1997, these services were performed by the Financial Management Division in the Departmental Offices. For the last half of FY 1997, accounting services and financial statement preparation were contracted to the Bureau of the Public Debt-Franchise Services.

With these first audited financial statements and stand-alone annual report, the CDFI Fund, a wholly owned government corporation, is not only complying with its enabling legislation, but also conforming to the spirit of the CFO Act of 1990 and the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993. In addition, in the first quarter of FY 1998, a Deputy Director for Management/Chief Financial Officer was appointed for the CDFI Fund and a process begun to establish an internal Fund financial management structure and staff.

Federal Managers’ Financial
Integrity Act (FMFIA) Highlights

During FY 1997, the CDFI Fund did not have a formal FMFIA program in place to evaluate, continuously monitor and improve the effectiveness of management controls associated with the Fund’s programs. Consequently, the Fund’s internal control process during this period lacked adequate individual program and operating level self-assessment to provide reasonable assurance that its systems of management, accounting, and administrative control, taken as a whole, achieved FMFIA and FFMIA objectives.

A formal FMFIA program enables management to make an assertion that:

As a first step towards the preparation of a CDFI Fund Annual Report and audited financial statements for FY 1997, the Fund management initiated an FMFIA review subsequent to September 30, 1997. As a result of this review, which did not include any transaction testing, the following material weaknesses were identified. Currently corrective action plans are being developed with target dates for completion in the first half of FY 1998.

  1. Title and Description: (CDFI 97-01) No formal FMFIA Program in place.
  2. CDFI did not have a formal FMFIA program in place during FY 1997 to evaluate, continuously monitor and improve the effectiveness of management controls associated with CDFI’s programs. Therefore, all of the Fund's internal control processes lacked adequate individual program and operating level self-assessment.

    Status and Accomplishments: Subsequent to September 30, 1997, the CDFI Fund management initiated an FMFIA review to assess its internal controls. This review identified seven material weaknesses and three instances of administrative systems’ non-conformance. During the first half of FY 1998, the Fund will establish a formal management control process and designate the Deputy Director for Management/CFO as the Fund’s Management Control Officer.

  3. Title and Description: (CDFI 97-02) CFO and Controller positions and functions not established.
  4. The CDFI Fund did not hire a Chief Financial Officer (CFO) until after September 30, 1997. Since a CFO’s duties would normally include overseeing all aspects of the Fund’s administrative, accounting, reporting, management controls, budgetary, portfolio monitoring, and compliance with laws and regulations, these areas were not receiving sufficient management attention during FY 1997. In addition, the Fund lacked a controller (financial manager) to oversee the day-to-day accounting functions, as well as the accounting activities performed for the Fund by the Bureau of the Public Debt. The lack of a CFO and Controller potentially impairs the Fund’s management ability to make sound financial decisions and to monitor the Fund’s financial and performance activities.

    Status and Accomplishments: A Deputy Director for Management/Chief Financial Officer was appointed in November, 1997. A staff accountant was hired in January, 1998. Additional financial positions are being developed and hiring will continue through the first half of FY 1998.

  5. Title and Description: (CDFI 97-03) Awards Administration and Monitoring Positions and functions not established.
  6. The duties of an awards officer normally include serving as the principal procedural authority, advisor and implementer of awards management policies. Key to such a function is the development and coordination of the Fund's awards management program, including the dissemination of procedural and technical advice, guidance and interpretation on CDFI award management activities and requirements, maintenance of award files, as well as sufficient monitoring of the pre- and post-award operations of the Fund. The lack of an awards manager impairs the Fund’s ability to carry out the above activities and to monitor CDFI’s program performance and compliance activities.

    Status and Accomplishments: Policies and procedures for an awards administration and monitoring function are being developed in the first half of FY 1998. An Awards Officer reported for duty in January, 1998.

  7. Title and Description: (CDFI 97-04) Post Award Monitoring Procedures not established and implemented.

The CDFI Fund lacked formalized, documented post-award monitoring procedures and responsibilities during FY 1997. Monitoring procedures provide a means to assess the award recipient’s compliance with their assistance agreements and to determine whether corrective actions are necessary or accomplished in an efficient and timely manner, and a methodology to aid the CDFI Fund in meeting its goals and objectives. Performance award monitoring procedures normally include, among other things, ensuring periodic financial and performance reports required to be submitted by the awardee are received by the Fund, reviewed, and acted upon accordingly. Monitoring procedures can also include site visits, and ensuring performance objectives are being achieved and the awardee’s reporting requirements are being met.

Status and Accomplishments: During the first half of FY 1998, the Fund will:

  1. Title and Description: (CDFI 97-05) No formal review of monthly financial statements and accounting records or completion of supporting reconciliations.
  2. Monthly trial balances and other reports such as spending transaction reports, budget and obligation reports were not routinely reviewed and reconciled to source documentation such as invoices and purchase orders. Where reviews were performed, documentation of the review procedures was not evident. There was no formalized administrative funds control policy or process. Lack of a formalized review of monthly financial statements and other financial reports impairs the Fund’s management ability to effectively and adequately monitor the CDFI Fund’s financial activities.

    Status and Accomplishments: During the first half of FY 1998, the Fund will establish a formal process for preparing and distributing monthly financial statements. The Deputy Director for Management/CFO will establish and implement Fund policies and procedures for the administrative control of funds. Monthly financial statements will be reviewed and any issues acted upon in a timely manner.

  3. Title and Description: (CDFI 97-06) Inadequate Delineation of Organizational Responsibilities.

During FY 1997 there was insufficient delineation of organization responsibilities within the Fund. In general, position descriptions were not adequately adhered to and/or do not adequately define the responsibilities of specific positions. The Fund has been understaffed since its inception in a number of key positions. In addition, there are no established procedures for periodically evaluating employee's performance against established performance criteria and goals. This combination of conditions resulted in instances of incompatible duties, lack of accountability, and ambiguous job responsibilities.

Status and Accomplishments: During the first half of FY 1998, the Fund will establish and formalize a new organizational structure centered around a Director and two Deputy Directors, a Deputy Director for Management/Chief Financial Officer and a Deputy Director for Policy and Programs. In addition the fund will:

  1. Title and Description: (CDFI 97-07) Program Award Files not completed.

During FY 1997, the CDFI Fund award files lacked a structured file order format and were not reviewed for completeness. A consistent and structured format is critical in order to have strong controls over the award process and overall monitoring of awards.

Status and Accomplishments: During the first half of FY 1998, the Fund will finalize an awards Table of Contents and identify all documents that should be included in the awards files for FY 1996 and FY 1997. These files will include all relevant documentation received from applicants, whether or not funds were awarded to the applicant. Files will be set up in accordance with the Table of Contents and each file reviewed for completeness. Thereafter, all files will be maintained in accordance with this master Table of Contents, with files updated timely and maintained in accordance with the Fund’s awards administration policies.

Management Responsibilities

The CDFI Fund management is responsible for the fair presentation of information contained in the principal financial statements, in conformity with the accounting hierarchy described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, which constitutes an "other comprehensive basis of accounting." Management is also responsible for the fair presentation of the Fund’s performance measures in accordance with Office of Management and Budget requirements. The quality of the Fund’s internal control structure rests with management, as well as the responsibility for identification and compliance with pertinent laws and regulations.

Limitations of the Financial Statements

The financial statements, included as part of this total package, present the financial position and results of operations of the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund for the years ended September 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995 pursuant to the requirements of the Government Management Reform Act of 1994. While the financial statements have been prepared from records in accordance with the formats prescribed by the Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 94-01, "Form and Content of Agency Financial Statements," the statements are different from the financial reports used to monitor and control budgetary resources that are prepared from the same records and are subsequently presented in Federal budget documents. Therefore, readers are advised that direct comparisons are not possible between figures found in this report and similar financial concepts found in the fiscal year 1997, 1996 and 1995 Budget of the United States Government. Additionally, the financial statements should be reviewed with the realization that they are for a sovereign entity (the United States Government), that liabilities not covered by budgetary resources reported in the financial statements cannot be liquidated without the enactment of an appropriation, and that the payment of all liabilities other than for contracts can be abrogated by the sovereign entity.

 

 

 

 

 

Reports from
the Auditors

 

 

Independent Auditors' Report on Financial Statements

 

 

The Inspector General, U.S. Department of the Treasury, and Director, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund:

We have audited the accompanying statements of financial position of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (the CDFI Fund) as of September 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995, and the related statements of operations and changes in net position and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the period from July 27, 1995 (inception) to September 30, 1995. These financial statements are the responsibility of the CDFI Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued
by the Comptroller General of the United States; and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Bulletin No. 93-06, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, as amended. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 1, these financial statements were prepared in conformity with the hierarchy of accounting principles and standards recommended by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board. This hierarchy is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted accounting principles.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Community Development Financial Institutions Fund as of September 30, 1997, 1996, and 1995, and the results of its operations, its changes in net position and its cash flows for the years ended September 30, 1997 and 1996, and the period from July 27, 1995 (inception) to September 30, 1995, in conformity with the basis of accounting described in Note 1.

 

 

 

I-1

As described in Note 1 to the financial statements, the CDFI Fund implemented Statement
of Federal Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for Liabilities of the Federal Government, effective October 1, 1996.

 

Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements of the CDFI Fund, taken as a whole. The information in the sections of the CDFI Fund Annual Report listed below is not a required part of the financial statements but is supplementary information required by OMB Bulletins No. 94-01 and No. 97-01, Form and Content of
Agency Financial Statements:

 

 

We have considered whether this information is materially inconsistent with the principal financial statements. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the financial statements, and accordingly, we express no opinion on it. The performance information included in the Program Discussion and Analysis and Financial Discussion and Analysis sections of the CDFI Fund Annual Report is addressed in our Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting in accordance with OMB Bulletin No. 93-06, as amended.

 

In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued reports dated February 23, 1998, on our consideration of the CDFI Fund's internal controls over financial reporting and on its compliance with laws and regulations.

 

This report is intended for the information of the CDFI Fund's management and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Inspector General. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited.

 

 

 

February 23, 1998
Washington, DC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I-2

 

 

 

Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

 

 

The Inspector General, U.S. Department of the Treasury, and

Director, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund:

 

We have audited the financial statements of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (the CDFI Fund) as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated February 23, 1998. Our report refers to the CDFI Fund's change in an accounting principle. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Bulletin No. 93-06, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, as amended.

 

The CDFI Fund's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls.
In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess
the expected benefits and related costs of internal control policies and procedures. The objectives of internal controls are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

II-1

 

Because of inherent limitations in internal controls, fraud may nevertheless occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of internal controls to future periods is subject to the risk that procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation of policies and procedures may deteriorate.

 

In planning and performing our audit, we considered the CDFI Fund's internal controls over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, and not to provide an opinion on internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. With respect to internal controls, we obtained an understanding of the design of relevant policies and procedures, determined if they have been placed in operation, assessed control risk, and performed tests of internal controls.

 

Our evaluation of the controls for performance information was limited to those controls designed to ensure the existence and completeness of the information. With respect to the performance measure control objective, we obtained an understanding of relevant internal control policies and procedures designed to permit preparation of reliable and complete performance information (e.g., program and statistical information), and we assessed control risk.

 

We noted certain matters involving the internal control over financial reporting and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and OMB Bulletin No. 93-06, as amended. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control over financial reporting that, in our judgment, could adversely affect the CDFI Fund's ability to ensure that the objectives of
the internal controls, as defined above, are being achieved. The reportable conditions we identified are described in accompanying Exhibit.

 

A material weakness is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements, in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited, or material to a performance measure or aggregation of related performance measures, may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Our consideration of internal controls would not necessarily disclose all matters in the internal controls that might be reportable conditions, and accordingly, would not necessarily disclose all reportable conditions that are also considered to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, we consider the matters identified in Comment A of the reportable conditions included in the Exhibit to be material weaknesses.

 

These conditions were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit procedures to be performed in our audit of the CDFI Fund's 1997 financial statements.

 

 

II-2

 

We also noted other matters involving internal controls and their operation that we have reported to the management of the CDFI Fund in a separate letter dated February 23, 1998.

 

This report is intended for the information of the CDFI Fund's management and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Inspector General. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited.

 

 

 

 

February 23, 1998

Washington, DC

 

 

II-3

 

Exhibit I

 

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FUND

Reportable Conditions in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A. Lack of a Formal FMFIA Process and Internal Controls over Procedures

 

During the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund’s (the CDFI Fund) initial operating period (July 27, 1995 to September 30, 1997), critical management personnel were
not in place and accordingly, internal control over financial reporting was not established
maintained. Although there was limited financial activity at the CDFI Fund during much of this
time, and certain financial managers within the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the Treasury)
were assigned responsibility for maintaining the financial records related to the CDFI Fund
activity, specific responsibility for establishing a system of internal controls and maintaining
accountability for CDFI Fund assets was not addressed. As financial activity increased
towards the end of fiscal year 1997, the need for separately identified and financially
accountable management for the CDFI Fund became more apparent and corrective actions
began to be taken.

 

However, during the period under audit, the following weaknesses in internal controls existed which could have adversely affected the CDFI Fund's ability to ensure that the objectives of internal controls, as previously identified, were achieved:

 

 

As a result of the foregoing, we concluded it was not cost-beneficial to place reliance on any
internal controls maintained by the Treasury over financial reporting for the CDFI Fund for fiscal years 1995 and 1996. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 1997, we evaluated and tested
relevant internal controls over financial reporting maintained at the Treasury on behalf of the CDFI and, for all three years, performed other substantive audit procedures to the extent we
considered necessary to satisfy ourselves that amounts reported in the financial statements
were materially correct.

II-4

 

Exhibit I, Continued

 

However, we believe immediate and continual attention must be placed on corrective action
necessary to eliminate the material weaknesses noted above. Failure to do so, along with the
expected increase in financial activity of the CDFI Fund over the next several years, could
result in material misstatements in the financial statements and/or material noncompliance with
laws and regulations that could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements.

 

We noted the CDFI Fund has taken important first steps in fiscal year 1998 to address these material weaknesses. Since the beginning of fiscal year 1998, the following critical management positions at the CDFI Fund have been filled:

As new personnel join the CDFI Fund, needed policies and procedures are among those items
that will be addressed. Additionally, the Deputy Director for Management/CFO brought in contractors to perform an FMFIA assessment for 1997 during the first quarter of fiscal year
1998. The plan is for this assessment to be performed internally in the future and become a part
of the CDFI Fund annual financial reporting process.

 

Plans to establish formal policies and procedures for administrative control of funds and reviews of monthly financial statements are currently being addressed by the Deputy Director for Management/CFO. Also, with the appointment of an Awards Officer, policies and procedures for post-award monitoring of awardees and awardee file maintenance are being addressed. Finally, we were informed by the Deputy Director for Management/CFO that the Fund plans to evaluate its structure and operations, to determine whether there are more efficient ways of accomplishing their goals and carrying out their mission.

 

Recommendation

We believe that the CDFI Fund has developed some strong plans for accomplishment in fiscal year 1998. We recommend that the CDFI continue to implement its plans and monitor whether their implementation is achieving their goals.

 

Specifically, action must be taken to:

 

 

II-5

 

Exhibit I, Continued

 

 

B. Recognition of Grant Award Expenses

 

The CDFI currently administers two grant award programs -- the CDFI Fund program, and the BEA program.

 

The CDFI program awards grants to awardees based on projected performance and with the condition that the awardee certify that eligible matching funds are available. Once a program assistance agreement is signed as evidence that the projected performance is approved and matching funds are certified as available, the CDFI Fund has incurred a liability to disburse
the grant funds to the awardee. Awards are not made on a reimbursement basis, and the awards are revocable only for failure to meet performance goals or other material noncompliance with program provisions.

 

The BEA program awards institutions for past performance and in anticipation of future performance goals set by the institution. The awards can be made over a period of time or all at once. Before payment is made, the BEA recipient must demonstrate that it has met the performance goals it set. Once the awardee has demonstrated that it has met its performance goals, a payable should be recognized by CDFI because no further action on the part of the awardee is required to "earn" the award.

 

Our audit revealed that liabilities incurred as a result of the awards process as described above had not been recorded by the CDFI Fund as earned by the awardees, but rather as the awards were disbursed. As a result, awards payable were understated by $19 million and $9.4 million
at September 30, 1997 and 1996, respectively. Audit adjustments to record the awards payable and related grants expense were made by CDFI to correct these accounting errors.

 

Recommendation

We recommend that the CDFI Fund record payables for grant awards and related grants expense at the point in time when the awards are earned by the awardees, rather than when disbursed in cash.

 

II-6

 

 

Independent Auditors' Report on Compliance with Laws and Regulations

 

 

 

The Inspector General, U.S. Department of the Treasury, and

Director, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund:

 

 

We have audited the financial statements of the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Community Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI) as of and for the year ended September 30, 1997, and have issued our report thereon dated February 23, 1998. Our report refers to the CDFI Fund's change in an accounting principle. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Bulletin No. 93-06, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, as amended.

 

The management of the CDFI Fund is responsible for complying with laws and regulations applicable to the CDFI Fund. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the CDFI Fund's financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of the CDFI Fund's compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts, and certain other laws and regulations specified in Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Bulletin No. 93-06, as amended, including the requirements referred to in the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA) of 1982 and the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act (FFMIA) of 1996. However, providing an opinion on compliance with certain provisions of laws and regulations was not an objective of our audit. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Material instances of noncompliance are failures to follow requirements, or violations of prohibitions, contained in laws or regulations that cause us to conclude that the aggregation of the misstatements resulting from those failures or violations is material to the financial statements, or the sensitivity of the matter would cause it to be perceived as significant by others. The results of the CDFI Fund's internal assessment and our tests of compliance disclosed the following instance of noncompliance that is required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards and OMB Bulletin 93-06, as amended.

 

 

 

 

 

III-1

Absence of a Formal FMFIA Process

 

From the inception of the CDFI Fund in fiscal year 1995 to the end of fiscal year 1997, the CDFI Fund did not have a process in place to assess and report on internal controls as required under FMFIA, including an assessment of its compliance with automated systems guidance as required by FFMIA. The results of an FMFIA assessment conducted subsequent to September 30, 1997 (during the first quarter of fiscal year 1998), disclosed a lack of controls over internal financial reporting and a lack of policies and procedures in place to manage award programs during the initial three-year operating period. It also disclosed critical management positions were vacant, including those of the Chief Financial Officer and an Awards Officer. Our audit tests confirmed these weaknesses. The overall weaknesses in CDFI Fund's internal controls is discussed in our Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting, dated February 23, 1998.

 

Recommendation

 

We recommend the filling of remaining essential management positions and establishment of procedures to assess internal controls through an FMFIA process continue to receive the highest priority of the CDFI Fund Director and Chief Financial Officer. (Action to begin in February 1998.)

 

Federal Financial Management Improvement Act Requirements

 

With respect to FFMIA, OMB Bulletin 93-06, as amended, requires us to report whether the CDFI Fund's financial management systems substantially comply with (1) the Federal financial management systems requirements, (2) applicable accounting standards, and (3) the United States Standard General Ledger at the transaction level. Accordingly, we performed tests of compliance using the implementation guidance for FFMIA issued by OMB on September 9, 1997.

 

As discussed above, the CDFI Fund did not conduct a formal FMFIA assessment in fiscal year 1997. This impacted the CDFI Fund's ability to assess financial systems compliance with Federal standards. This matter was reported as a material weakness in the CDFI Fund's internal controls. In addition, the CDFI Fund has a material weakness relating to recording awards expenses and payables transactions, which is an indication of noncompliance with applicable accounting standards. This weakness is discussed in the Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting, dated February 23, 1998.

 

An audit of financial statements conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and OMB Bulletin No. 93-06 is not designed to detect whether the CDFI Fund's systems are Year 2000 compliant. Further, we have no responsibility with regard to the CDFI Fund's efforts to make its systems,

 

 

III-2

 

or any other systems, such as those of the CDFI Fund's vendors, service providers, or any other third parties, Year 2000 compliant or provide assurance on whether the CDFI Fund has addressed or will be able to address all of the affected systems on a timely basis. These are responsibilities of the CDFI Fund's management.

 

Recommendation

 

Our recommendation relating to the FMFIA process and improving controls are discussed in our separately issued Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting, dated February 23, 1998. (Action to begin in March 1998.)

 

* * * * *

 

This report is intended for the information of the CDFI Fund's management and the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Inspector General. However, this report is a matter of public record and its distribution is not limited.

 

 

 

February 23, 1998
Washington, DC

 

 

 

 

 

III-3

 

 

 

Financial
Statements

 

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund

Statements of Financial Position

As of September 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995

 

   

1997

 

1996

 

1995

Assets

           

Intragovernmental Assets

           

Fund Balances with Treasury (Note 2)

$

104,926,682

$

93,276,885

$

49,939,272

Advances and Prepayments

 

38,124

 

21,986

 

1,961

Governmental Assets

           

Investments

 

5,996,900

       

Credit Program Receivables (Note 3)

 

2,260,892

       

Interest Receivable

 

14,860

       

Total Assets

$

113,237,458

$

93,298,871

$

49,941,233

             

Liabilities

           

Liabilities Covered by Budgetary Resources

           

Intragovernmental Liabilities

           

Accounts Payable

$

111,588

$

70,324

$

 

Interest Payable

 

251,970

       

Debt (Note 4)

 

3,712,601

       

Governmental Liabilities

           

Accounts Payable

 

480,659

 

145,663

 

4,742

Awards Payable

 

19,029,187

 

9,425,453

   

Accrued Payroll

 

9,202

 

28,894

 

19,160

Total Liabilities Covered by Budgetary Resources

 

23,595,207

 

9,670,334

 

23,902

             

Liabilities Not Covered by Budgetary Resources

           

Governmental Liabilities

           

Accrued Annual Leave

 

61,727

 

34,288

 

4,489

Total Liabilities Not Covered by Budgetary Resources

 

61,727

 

34,288

 

4,489

Total Liabilities

 

23,656,934

 

9,704,622

 

28,391

             

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 3, 6 and 8)

           
             

Net Position (Note 5)

           

Balances

           

Unexpended Appropriations

 

83,645,351

 

83,628,537

 

49,917,331

Invested Capital

 

5,996,900

       

Future Funding Requirements

 

(61,727)

 

(34,288)

 

(4,489)

Total Net Position

 

89,580,524

 

83,594,249

 

49,912,842

Total Liabilities and Net Position

$

113,237,458

$

93,298,871

$

49,941,233

             
             

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund

Statements of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Years Ended September 30, 1997 and 1996

and the Period from July 27, 1995 (inception) to September 30, 1995

 

   

1997

 

1996

 

1995

             

Revenues and Financing Sources

           
             

Appropriated Capital Used

$

43,947,778

$

11,288,794

$

437,854

Interest and Penalties, Non-Federal

 

35,087

       

Interest, Federal

 

176,181

       

Interest, Subsidy

 

40,702

       

Other Financing Sources (Note 7)

 

27,548

       
             

Total Revenues and Financing Sources

 

44,227,296

 

11,288,794

 

437,854

             

Expenses

           
             

CDFI Grants and Subsidies

 

20,007,372

       

BEA Grants

 

19,348,245

 

9,425,453

   

Administration

 

4,646,573

 

1,892,924

 

442,343

Total Operating Expenses (Note 8)

 

44,002,190

 

11,318,377

 

442,343

             

Interest

           

Federal Financing Bank/Treasury Borrowing

 

251,970

       

Other

 

575

 

216

   
             

Total Expenses

 

44,254,735

 

11,318,593

 

442,343

             

Shortage of Revenues and Financing Sources

           

Over Total Expenses

$

(27,439)

$

(29,799)

$

(4,489)

             
             

Net Position, Beginning Balance as Previously Stated

$

83,594,249

$

49,912,842

$

 

Prior Period Adjustments

 

(38,508)

       

Net Position, Beginning Balance as Adjusted

 

83,555,741

 

49,912,842

   

Shortage of Revenues and Financing Sources

           

Over Total Expenses

 

(27,439)

 

(29,799)

 

(4,489)

Non-Operating Changes (Note 9)

 

6,052,222

 

33,711,206

 

49,917,331

             

Net Position, Ending Balance

$

89,580,524

$

83,594,249

$

49,912,842

             
             

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

 

 

Community Development Financial Institutions Fund

Statement of Cash Flows

Years Ended September 30, 1997 and 1996

and the Period from July 27, 1995 (inception) to September 30, 1995

 

   

1997