Outreach Initiatives Need to Ensure Taxpayers Receive the
Benefit of the Child Tax and Additional Child Tax Credits
September 2002
Reference
Number: 2002-40-203
This report has cleared the Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosure review process and
information determined to be restricted from public release has been redacted
from this document.
September
27, 2002
MEMORANDUM FOR COMMISSIONER, WAGE AND INVESTMENT DIVISION
FROM: Michael R. Phillips /s/ Michael R.
Phillips
Acting Deputy Inspector
General for Audit
SUBJECT: Final Audit Report - Outreach Initiatives Need to Ensure Taxpayers
Receive the Benefit of the Child Tax and Additional Child Tax Credits (Audit # 200240057)
This
report presents the results of our review to assess the progress made by the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in its initiative to notify individual taxpayers
who may be eligible for unclaimed Child Tax Credits (CTC) and Additional Child
Tax Credits (ACTC).
In the IRS Restructuring and
Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98), the Congress directed the IRS to review and
restate its mission to increase its emphasis on serving the public and meeting
taxpayer needs. The IRS responded by
changing its mission statement to emphasize the importance of customer service
and developing a strategy to better understand and resolve taxpayer problems
while also reducing taxpayer burden. As
a positive step toward carrying out this strategy, the IRS proposed an
initiative for 2002 to identify and contact taxpayers who appeared eligible for,
but failed to claim, the CTC and/or ACTC on their 2001 Individual Income Tax
Returns. This initiative would have
required the IRS to develop a specific computer program to ensure taxpayers
received an advisory notice of their potential eligibility. It was proposed as an alternative approach
to the IRS’ original programming request that was not completed because of the
programming demands required for legislative tax laws and changes.
The IRS’ proactive
initiative to implement an alternative approach was recently interrupted when
the IRS concluded that it would also be unable to complete the initiative as a
fallback approach because of legal and budgetary concerns and the programming
complexities required. The IRS currently has
no alternative plan to assist the large number of primarily low-income
taxpayers who may be affected by this decision.
Since 1999, the IRS has been
aware that some taxpayers who appear qualified were not claiming the CTC. In a prior Treasury Inspector General for
Tax Administration (TIGTA) report, the IRS stated that it would
communicate to taxpayers through future outreach programs. Although the IRS has initiated several
actions to educate taxpayers through publications and community outreach
programs designed to publicize the tax benefits available from the provisions
of the CTC and/or ACTC, many taxpayers are not claiming the credit.
During the
processing of individual tax returns between January 1, 2002, and May 31, 2002,
we identified 611,560 returns on which taxpayers did not claim potential tax
credits totaling $238 million in ACTC for
Tax Year 2001. Eighty-seven percent of these taxpayers
qualified under the new provisions for the ACTC in the Economic Growth and Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA),
with
74 percent reporting earned income of
less than $25,000 per year. The IRS’
decision to cancel the 2002 initiative will prevent the issuance of advisory
notices to these 611,560 taxpayers.
In
April 2002, we issued a memorandum to the Director, Submission Processing,
recommending that the IRS consider modifying its proposed initiative. This modification suggested accelerating the
issuance of notices by using the TIGTA’s listing of affected returns as a means
to quickly notify taxpayers of their potential ACTC eligibility.
Currently, the IRS assigns
the highest priority to the required computer programming necessary to
implement legislative tax laws and changes each year. To ensure a better chance of success for future outreach initiatives,
we also recommended that the IRS reevaluate placing a higher priority on the
necessary discretionary computer programming based on the related tax laws that
these initiatives are intended to support.
Management’s
Response to Memorandum #1: The Director, Submission Processing, replied to our
recommendation to modify the IRS’ proposed initiative by stating that an IRS
organizational decision had been made not to issue advisory notices to
taxpayers who had not claimed tax credits for the CTC and/or ACTC on their
original tax returns. The primary
reason for this decision was an IRS concern that it had no legal requirement to
notify taxpayers of unclaimed or under-claimed tax credits and to do so would
set a significant precedent, causing potentially adverse consequences for the
IRS. Other reasons included the impact
on resources and a possible negative impact on the computer programming
resources required to implement legislative changes for the next filing season.
As an alternative to our
recommendation, the IRS proposed exploring ways to improve taxpayer awareness,
such as requesting assistance through the Stakeholder Partnerships, Education,
and Communication organization. The IRS’ complete
response to the Memorandum is included as Appendix VI.
Office of Audit Comment: We agree
that improving taxpayer awareness is something the IRS should always strive for
in the future. However, an increased
awareness effort may not help the primarily low-income taxpayers currently
affected by the condition identified since they would be required to file an
amended tax return if eligible. The
amended return process has been noted as a significant source of taxpayer
burden according to the Taxpayer Advocate Service’s 2001 report to the Congress,
which shows amended returns ranking second on its list of taxpayer problems.
Secondly, the IRS states as the primary basis for its
decision that it is not legally obligated to issue notices to taxpayers that
either did not claim or under-claimed tax credits on their tax returns. Although taxpayers are responsible for
filing complete and accurate returns, the IRS proactively planned to notify
taxpayers of their potential credit eligibility in its proposed
initiative. This planned action is
similar to the one currently used to notify taxpayers of potential Earned
Income Tax Credit eligibility.
Providing quality service for many organizations,
both public and private, may at times mean doing more than just what is
required by law or procedure. For
example, the RRA 98 mandated that the IRS change its mission and increase its
emphasis on serving the public and taxpayer needs. We believe this includes ensuring that taxpayers not only comply
with existing tax laws but also receive adequate assistance when tax laws are
changed or added. Outreach initiatives
help ensure that taxpayers, particularly those with low income, receive the tax
benefits they are entitled to and that the Congress intended. They also play an important part in the
overall quality service the IRS provides.
Management’s
Response to the Draft Report:
While IRS management did not
agree with Recommendation 1, they plan to work with the TIGTA in a cooperative
effort to initiate a viable alternative to inform the 611,560 taxpayers
identified of their potential eligibility relating to the $238 million in
unclaimed ACTC. The IRS will mail
special advisory information to taxpayers identified as potentially eligible
for the ACTC and provide them tax forms and instructions on how to claim the credit
if eligible.
The IRS also does not agree with Recommendation
2. No corrective action is planned on
this recommendation due to priority demands associated with implementing new
tax law changes and other critical programming needs. The IRS stated that, “As an organization, we must make difficult
decisions based on priorities to implement changes to the tax law and to
support the Modernization effort.” Management’s
complete response to the draft report is included as Appendix VII.
Office of Audit Comment: While we believe Recommendation 2 is worthy of further
consideration, we recognize the limitations expressed by the IRS. We do not intend to elevate our disagreement
concerning this matter to the Department of the Treasury for resolution and
believe the IRS will continue working to overcome such limitations in the
future.
Copies of this
report are also being sent to the IRS managers who are affected by the report
recommendations. Please contact me at
(202) 622-6510 if you have questions or Michael R. Phillips, Assistant
Inspector General for Audit (Wage and Investment Income Programs), at (202)
927-0597.
Appendix I – Detailed Objective, Scope, and Methodology
Appendix II – Major Contributors to This Report
Appendix III – Report Distribution List
Appendix IV – Outcome Measures
Appendix VI – Management’s Response to Memorandum #1
Appendix VII – Management’s Response to the Draft Report
The Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98) made wide-ranging changes relating to the operations of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In the RRA 98, the Congress directed the IRS to review and restate its mission to increase its emphasis on serving the public and meeting taxpayer needs. The IRS revised its mission statement from one that focused on collecting the proper amount of tax to one that emphasized providing top quality service to taxpayers.
To assist in achieving its new mission, the IRS developed a strategic plan that includes strategic goals, guiding principles, and major strategies to guide the IRS toward its new mission emphasis. Some important points outlined by the new strategic plan include providing service to each taxpayer, understanding and solving problems from the customer’s point of view, meeting taxpayer needs, and reducing taxpayer burden. These actions are intended to better serve taxpayers in the future; however, for many, the degree of success will depend on and be measured by how well the IRS implements the intent based within this strategy.
The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) included several new provisions for Tax Year (TY) 2001 that provide tax relief to low-income families. These provisions modified the existing Child Tax Credit (CTC), added a new 10 percent tax rate bracket, and created a Rate Reduction Credit (RRC). The CTC was established by the Tax Relief Act of 1997 (TRA 97) and was the first tax credit based solely on a family’s number of children. The TRA 97 provided a $500 credit for every child in a family under the age of 17. The Congress believed this credit would help reduce the tax burden for taxpayers, recognize the financial responsibilities of raising dependent children, and promote family values.
In Congressional testimony prior to the passage of the EGTRRA, concern was raised that the original proposal to increase the amount of the CTC over the next 10 years to $1000 per child would not benefit an estimated 12.2 million low- and moderate-income families with children. To address this concern, the Congress modified the CTC provisions and made the credit refundable for taxpayers with any number of children, rather than limiting it to families with three or more children, as under the TRA 97.
All taxpayers can now receive a refund of their CTC when they have no tax liability. However, the refund is limited to 10 percent of a taxpayer’s earned income over $10,000. This percentage will be increased to 15 percent for TYs 2005 and beyond. The refundable CTC is commonly known as the Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC).
We performed this review from April through June 2002 with IRS executives and personnel in the IRS’ Submission Processing Headquarters offices in Cincinnati, Ohio, and New Carrollton, Maryland. Audit fieldwork was performed at the IRS Submission Processing Campus located in Austin, Texas.
The audit was conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards. Detailed information on our audit objective, scope, and methodology is presented in Appendix I. Major contributors to the report are listed in Appendix II.
Since 1999, the IRS has been aware that some taxpayers who appear qualified were not claiming the CTC. In a prior Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) report, the IRS acknowledged this and indicated that it would continue efforts to effectively communicate with taxpayers regarding this credit through outreach programs. Although the IRS has initiated several actions in recent years to educate taxpayers through publications and community outreach programs designed to publicize the tax benefits available from the provisions of the CTC and/or ACTC, many taxpayers are not claiming the credit.
Prior
to 2002, the IRS accurately predicted that some taxpayers would fail to claim
the ACTC under the new tax law provisions of the EGTRRA. During
the period of January 1, 2002, through May 31, 2002, our computer analysis
identified approximately 1.6 million TY 2001 returns where taxpayers claimed
the ACTC. However, our analysis also
identified an additional 611,560 returns on which taxpayers appeared eligible
for, but did not claim, the ACTC totaling $238 million.
To address this situation and to carry out the guiding principles in the IRS’ strategic plan, the IRS originally planned to conduct an outreach initiative in 2002 that would enable it to contact taxpayers who appeared eligible for, but did not to claim, tax credit for the CTC and/or ACTC on their Individual Income Tax Returns. To accomplish this initiative would require that the IRS develop and program an automated computer process to identify potentially eligible taxpayers as their tax returns were being processed each year.
This process is similar to the service the IRS currently provides to taxpayers for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). Using information taken each year from individual tax returns, an automated process sends notices to taxpayers stating that they may be eligible for the EITC and requests the taxpayer to respond with additional information needed for the IRS to make an eligibility determination. Returning the notice with the additional information serves as a claim for the credit, and the taxpayer can receive the EITC without having to file an amended return.
However, because of the high priority assigned to the programming demands required for the new legislative tax laws and changes in 2002, the IRS’ original initiative could not be programmed. Using an alternative approach, the IRS proposed an initiative requiring a computer program that would be used to identify eligible taxpayers at a later date after their 2001 tax return had been processed, rather than during filing season processing.
Unfortunately, the IRS later concluded that it would also be unable to implement this alternative approach because of concerns that the IRS had no legal requirement to notify taxpayers of unclaimed or under-claimed tax credits and to do so would establish a significant precedent. The IRS believed that setting such a precedent could obligate the IRS to contact other taxpayers who may be eligible for other various types of tax credits. Additional reasons for canceling the initiative included the impact on available resources and a possible negative impact on the computer programming resources required to implement legislative changes for the 2003 Filing Season.
The
IRS currently has no alternative plan to assist the large number of primarily
low-income taxpayers that may be affected by this decision in the future or to
effectively issue advisory notices on the 611,560 returns of taxpayers who
appear eligible for, but did not claim, the CTC and/or ACTC for TY 2001.
These taxpayers were identified in the following two groups:
·
Taxpayers who appeared eligible for, but did not
claim, the credit on their originally filed 2001 Individual Income Tax Returns. On 478,888 returns, the taxpayers appeared
to be eligible to claim the ACTC but simply failed to do so. The potential unclaimed ACTC on these
returns totaled approximately $212.3 million.
·
Taxpayers who did not
receive the credit after becoming eligible when their returns were corrected
for errors during IRS processing. On 132,672 returns, the taxpayers
appeared to be ineligible for the ACTC on their returns as originally
filed. However, after these returns
were corrected for errors during IRS processing, the correction resulted in the
taxpayers also becoming eligible for the ACTC.
Although alerted to this condition by processing function employees, the
IRS made a decision not to apply the credit during the error correction process
based on the planned 2002 outreach initiative.
Unapplied ACTC on these returns totaled approximately $25.7 million.
For the 611,560 returns in these 2 taxpayer groups, 87 percent (530,905) qualified for the ACTC under the new tax law provisions of the EGTRRA and 74 percent (451,646) reported earned income of less than $25,000 per year.
|
Income Ranges of Taxpayers Not Claiming |
||
|
Earned Income Ranges |
Number of Returns |
Percentage |
|
$10,000 to $14,999 |
156,615 |
25.61% |
|
$15,000 to $19,999 |
175,826 |
28.75% |
|
$20,000 to $24,999 |
119,205 |
19.49% |
|
$25,000 to $29,999 |
70,851 |
11.59% |
|
Over $30,000 |
89,063 |
14.56% |
|
Total |
611,560 |
100.00% |
|
Returns processed between
January 1 and May 31, 2002. |
||
Source: Analysis of the IRS Individual Return Transaction File.
In addition, the potential refund of unclaimed ACTC on these 611,560 returns averages $389.38, with the 2 largest return filing groups being unmarried head of household (59 percent) and married filing jointly (35 percent).
The chart was removed due to its size. To see the chart, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
As the IRS moves forward with its modernization efforts, priority must be placed on ways to integrate quality taxpayer service into all aspects of IRS processes. Computer programming should include an effective means for reducing taxpayer burden as well as efficiently processing tax information. This will enable the IRS to serve taxpayers by reducing taxpayer burden and providing taxpayers with the legislated tax benefits that they may be entitled to. Such action is needed for the IRS to change from an organization that concentrates on collecting the proper amount of tax to one that also emphasizes providing top quality service to taxpayers, as stated in the IRS mission statement and required by the RRA 98 legislation. This is especially true for low-income taxpayers who may be unable to afford the services of a tax preparer to help ensure they receive appropriate tax benefits in the future.
1. The Commissioner, Wage and Investment (W&I), should consider modifying its 2002 outreach initiative to taxpayers by accelerating the issuance of advisory notices to ensure that taxpayers receive the tax benefit of the ACTC for TY 2001. Please see Appendix V for additional details in the TIGTA memorandum issued April 30, 2002.
Management’s Response to Memorandum #1: The Director, Submission Processing, replied to our recommendation to modify the IRS’ proposed initiative by stating that an organizational decision had been made not to issue advisory notices to taxpayers who had not claimed tax credits for the CTC and/or ACTC on their original tax returns. The primary reason for this decision was an IRS concern that it had no legal requirement to notify taxpayers of unclaimed or under-claimed tax credits and to do so would set a significant precedent, causing potentially adverse consequences for the IRS. Other reasons included the impact on resources estimated at $14.4 million to print, mail, and process the notices and a possible negative impact on the computer programming resources required to implement legislative changes for the next filing season.
As an alternative to our recommendation, the IRS proposed exploring ways to improve taxpayer awareness such as requesting assistance through the Stakeholder Partnerships, Education, and Communication organization.
Office of Audit Comment: We agree that improving taxpayer awareness is something the IRS should always strive for in the future. However, an increased awareness effort may not help the primarily low-income taxpayers currently affected by the condition identified since they would be required to file an amended tax return if eligible. The amended return process has been noted as a significant source of taxpayer burden according to the Taxpayer Advocate Service’s 2001 report to the Congress, which shows amended returns ranking second on its list of taxpayer problems.
Secondly, the IRS states as the primary basis for its decision that it is not legally obligated to issue notices to taxpayers that either did not claim or under-claimed tax credits on their tax returns. Although taxpayers are responsible for filing complete and accurate returns, the IRS proactively planned to notify taxpayers of their potential credit eligibility in its proposed initiative. This planned action is similar to the one currently used to notify taxpayers of their potential eligibility for the EITC.
Providing quality service for many
organizations, both public and private, may at times mean doing more than just
what is required by law or procedure.
For example, the RRA 98 mandated that the IRS change its mission and
increase its emphasis on serving the public and taxpayer needs. We believe this includes ensuring that
taxpayers not only comply with existing tax laws but also receive adequate
assistance when tax laws are changed or added.
Outreach initiatives help ensure that taxpayers, particularly those with
low income, receive the tax benefits they are entitled to and that the Congress
intended. They also play an important
part in the overall quality service the IRS provides.
Management’s Response to the Draft Report:
IRS management stated, “Although we cannot agree with this
recommendation, through our cooperative efforts we will initiate a viable
alternative to inform taxpayers of their potential eligibility. As a result of TIGTA’s willingness to
provide taxpayer address information, we will mail special advisory information
to taxpayers identified as potentially eligible for the ACTC and provide them
tax forms and instructions on how to claim the credit if eligible.”
2. The Commissioner, W&I, should reevaluate placing a higher priority on the discretionary computer programming necessary to implement future outreach initiatives based on the related tax laws that these initiatives are intended to support.
Management’s Response: IRS management stated, “Due to high priority demands associated with implementing new tax law changes and other critical programming needs, the IRS was not able to implement the Additional Child Tax Credit initiative.” Management also stated, “As an organization, we must make difficult decisions based on priorities to implement changes to the tax law and to support the Modernization effort.”
Office
of Audit Comment: While we believe our recommendation is worthy of further
consideration, we recognize the limitations expressed by the IRS. We do not intend to elevate our disagreement
concerning this matter to the Department of the Treasury for resolution and
believe the IRS will continue working to overcome such limitations in the
future.
Appendix I
Detailed Objective, Scope, and Methodology
The overall objective of this review was to assess the progress made by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in its plans to notify individual taxpayers who may be eligible for unclaimed Child Tax Credits (CTC) and Additional Child Tax Credits (ACTC). This review focused on the IRS’ plans in 2002 to notify taxpayers who appeared eligible to claim the ACTC on their 2001 Individual Income Tax Return. To accomplish our objective, we:
I.
Assessed the status of
the IRS’ plans to notify taxpayers who appear eligible for the CTC and ACTC.
A.
Interviewed IRS program management and determined their
plans and the status of the ACTC outreach initiative.
B.
Reviewed Requests for Information Services and
determined their status.
II.
Identified taxpayers who had not claimed the ACTC on
their 2001 Individual Income Tax Returns that appeared eligible.
A.
Requested support from the Treasury Inspector General
for Tax Administration Electronic Data Processing Group with
computer-identifying returns of taxpayers processed to the Individual Master
File (IMF) who appeared eligible for the ACTC.
B.
Computer-analyzed the IRS’ Return Transaction File
(RTF) Tax Year 2001 records from January 1, 2002, through May 31, 2002, and
developed specific criteria to select individual return data for taxpayers who
appeared eligible for the ACTC. The
selected data were analyzed and updated each week after posting to the IMF. The analysis resulted in 611,560 returns being identified for
taxpayers who appear entitled to, but did not claim, $238 million in ACTC.
C.
Computer-analyzed the return data in II.B above to
identify the characteristics of the taxpayers eligible for the ACTC. The analysis determined that 451,646 (74
percent) of the returns reported earned income of less that $25,000 per
year. In addition, the 2 largest filing
groups with unclaimed credit were unmarried head of household 359,516 (59
percent) and married filing jointly 216,158 (35 percent). On 530,905 returns (87 percent), the
taxpayers qualified for the ACTC under the new tax law provisions of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001.
Appendix II
Major Contributors to This Report
Michael R. Phillips, Assistant
Inspector General for Audit (Wage and Investment Income Programs)
Stanley Rinehart, Director
Gary Young, Audit Manager
Steven
Vandigriff, Senior Auditor
Lawrence White, Senior Auditor
Glory Jampetero, Auditor
Appendix III
Commissioner N:C
Deputy Commissioner, Wage and Investment Division W
Director, Customer Account Services W:CAS
Director, Submission Processing W:CAS:SP
Director, Strategy and Finance W:S
Chief Counsel CC
National Taxpayer Advocate
TA
Director, Legislative Affairs CL:LA
Director, Office of
Program Evaluation and Risk Analysis
N:ADC:R:O
Office of Management Controls N:CFO:F:M
Audit Liaison: Program/Process Assistant Coordinator, Wage and Investment Division W:HR
Appendix IV
This appendix
presents detailed information on the measurable impact that our report will
have on tax administration. This impact
will be incorporated into our Semiannual Report to the Congress.
Type and Value of Outcome Measure:
· Taxpayer Entitlements – Potential; 478,888 returns on which taxpayers appeared eligible for, but did not claim, $212.3 million in Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC).
These 478,888 returns represent part of a total population of 611,560 returns that the Treasury Inspector General Tax Administration (TIGTA) has identified as potentially eligible to receive unclaimed ACTC totaling $238 million. The remaining 132,672 returns will also not be contacted, based on an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) decision, and the additional outcome measure showing $25.7 million of unapplied ACTC will be reported in a separate TIGTA report.
Methodology Used to Measure the Reported Benefit:
The TIGTA conducted a computer analysis during the 2002 Filing Season to determine if taxpayers were receiving the full benefits of new tax law provisions. We acquired the current (Tax Year 2001) IRS’ Individual Return Transaction File (RTF) records and developed specific criteria to select certain individual return data for taxpayers affected by the new tax laws. The selected data were further analyzed and updated generally once each week after posting to the Individual Master File (IMF). The 478,888 returns identified represent taxpayers who appeared entitled to, but did not claim, $212.3 million of the ACTC based on our analysis of all 2001 Individual Income Tax Returns that were added to the RTF between January 1, 2002, and May 31, 2002.
To identify and
quantify the credit not taken by these taxpayers, we selected only the returns
where IRS processing determined that the taxpayer was eligible for the Child
Tax Credit (CTC), but not all the CTC had been used to offset the taxpayer’s
tax liability, and the return contained the following three conditions: (1) the taxpayer did not claim the ACTC, (2)
the taxpayer had sufficient earned income to qualify for the ACTC, and (3) the
taxpayer showed a tax liability of zero.
Appendix V
Memorandum #1:
Recommendation to Accelerate Outreach to Taxpayers Who Did Not Receive
the Additional Child Tax Credit for 2001
Memorandum #1 was removed due to its size. To see Memorandum #1, please go to the Adobe PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Appendix VI
Management’s Response to Memorandum #1
Appendix VII
Management’s Response to Memorandum #1 was removed due to its size. To see the response, please go to the Adobe PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Management’s Response to the
Draft Report
The response
was removed due to its size. To see the
complete response, please go to the Adobe PDF version of the report on the
TIGTA Public Web Page.