TREASURY
INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX ADMINISTRATION
Annual Assessment of the Business Systems Modernization Program
June 24, 2008
Reference Number: 2008-20-129
Phone Number |
202-622-6500
Email Address | inquiries@tigta.treas.gov
Web Site |
http://www.tigta.gov
June 24, 2008
MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
FROM: Michael R. Phillips /s/ Michael R. Phillips
Deputy Inspector General for Audit
SUBJECT: Final Audit Report – Annual Assessment of the Business Systems Modernization Program (Audit # 200820005)
This report presents the results of our annual assessment of
the Business Systems Modernization (Modernization) Program. The overall objective of this review was to assess
the progress of the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) Modernization Program for
Fiscal Year 2008, as required by the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.[1]
Impact on the Taxpayer
The Modernization Program, which began in 1999, is a complex effort to modernize the IRS’ technology and related business processes. This effort involves integrating thousands of hardware and software components and must be done while replacing outdated technology and maintaining the current tax system. The IRS has achieved some successes in addressing these crucial challenges, but it still must overcome significant barriers to manage the inherent risks of modernization and deliver a level of service American taxpayers expect.
Synopsis
In December 1998, the IRS hired the Computer Sciences Corporation as its PRIME contractor[2] for the Modernization Program. The IRS originally relied on the PRIME contractor to act as a systems integrator to find and manage the best expertise and technical resources to achieve its organizational goals. In January 2005, due to budget reductions and concerns about the adequacy of the PRIME contractor’s performance, the IRS began transitioning many activities from the PRIME contractor and taking over the primary role as the systems integrator for all projects.
The IRS originally estimated that the Modernization Program would last up to 15 years and incur contractor costs of approximately $8 billion. According to the IRS’ original plan, the Program would be past the halfway point by Calendar Year 2008. The Program is in its 10th year and has received approximately $2.5 billion for contractor services, plus an additional $310 million for internal IRS costs. The IRS plans to spend $267 million on the Program in Fiscal Year 2008.
The IRS has achieved successes
when the Modernization Program followed its systems development and management
guidance. The Program has progressed
more effectively with the implementation of the Enterprise Services
organization’s management components, and with the development of the
Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy as a map for future
development. However, the IRS and its
contractors must overcome significant barriers in successfully implementing the
goals of the Modernization Program. The Program
and processes have not progressed enough to eliminate its material weakness
designation, and further reductions in funding could jeopardize the Program’s
ability to deliver planned improvements.
Response
The Chief Information Officer
responded that the IRS was pleased the annual assessment recognized the
progress in implementing Modernization projects, validating improvements in
contracting procedures affecting the Modernization Program, and documenting
work to institutionalize the Information Technology Modernization Vision and
Strategy. The Chief Information Officer
also stated that the IRS has taken
additional steps to improve Modernization Program performance including
development of strategies to confront risks and issues to future system
releases, efforts to address human capital challenges and succession planning, and
development and implementation of a methodology for quantitatively measuring
and reporting on project scope. The Chief Information Officer stated that he appreciated our continued support and the
valuable assistance and guidance the audit team provides. Management’s complete response to the
draft report is included as Appendix X.
Copies of this report are also being sent to the IRS managers affected by the report. Please contact me at (202) 622-6510 if you have questions or Preston B. Benoit, Acting Assistant Inspector General for Audit (Information Systems Programs), at (202) 622-5894.
The Modernization
Program Continues to Achieve Success
Significant Barriers Continue to Challenge the Successful Completion of the Modernization Program
Appendices
Appendix
I – Detailed Objective, Scope, and Methodology
Appendix
II – Major Contributors to This Report
Appendix
III – Report Distribution List
Appendix
IV – Enterprise Life Cycle Overview
Appendix V
– Modernization Program Funding
Appendix
VI – Project Cost and Schedule Variance Analysis
Appendix VII –
Open Recommendations Related to Modernization Program Material Weaknesses
Appendix
IX – Glossary of Terms
Appendix X
– Management’s Response to the Draft Report
Abbreviations
|
CADE |
Customer Account Data Engine |
|
CIO |
Chief Information Officer |
|
e-File |
Electronic filing |
|
IRS |
Internal Revenue Service |
|
MITS |
Modernization and Information Technology
Services |
|
TIGTA |
Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration |
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998[3] requires the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) to annually evaluate the adequacy and security of IRS information technology. This report provides our assessment of the IRS Business Systems Modernization (Modernization) Program for Fiscal Year 2008.
The Modernization Program, which began in 1999, is a complex effort to modernize the IRS’ technology and related business processes. This effort involves integrating thousands of hardware and software components. All of this is being done while replacing outdated technology and maintaining the current tax system.
In December 1998, the IRS hired the Computer Sciences Corporation as its PRIME contractor[4] for the Modernization Program. The IRS originally relied on the PRIME contractor to act as a systems integrator to find and manage the best expertise and technical resources to achieve the IRS’ organizational goals. In January 2005, due to budget reductions and concerns about the adequacy of the PRIME contractor’s performance, the IRS began transitioning many activities from the PRIME contractor and taking over the primary role as the systems integrator for all projects. The systems integrator role is a significant operational change for the IRS, requiring new procedures, personnel, and offices. The IRS has successfully taken the first steps to transition modernization activities away from the PRIME contractor and is taking additional actions to build on these initial steps. For example, the IRS developed the Enterprise Transition Strategy, which documents the overall strategy for realizing the vision and goals of the IRS. In addition, the IRS has developed a Requirements Management Office and updated the Enterprise Life Cycle Guide[5] to include paths common to IRS modernization projects.
The IRS planned
to complete the Modernization Program in 15 years at a cost of approximately $8
billion.
The IRS originally estimated that the Modernization Program effort would last up to 15 years and incur contractor costs of approximately $8 billion. According to the IRS’ original plan, the Program would be past the halfway point by Calendar Year 2008. The Modernization Program is in its 10th year and has received approximately $2.5 billion for contractor services, plus an additional $310 million for internal IRS costs. The IRS plans to spend $267 million on the Program in Fiscal Year 2008. Appendix V presents an analysis of Modernization Program funding since its inception.
The compilation of information for this report was conducted
at the TIGTA office in
The Modernization Program Continues to Achieve Success
The Modernization
Program has continued to deploy new project application releases and improve
its program management.
The IRS has continued to improve its abilities and processes that are critical to ultimately achieving success in modernizing its business systems. Since July 2007, the IRS has implemented further capabilities and provided improvements to taxpayers and stakeholders. These successes include deploying new releases for the Customer Account Data Engine (CADE), Modernized e-File, and Account Management Services projects. The Modernization Program has also improved contract negotiations and management practices, assumed more responsibility for Program integration, expanded the Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy, and continued addressing organizational and Program concerns through the Highest Priority Initiatives process.
Enhanced capabilities have been added to the CADE
The CADE will provide the foundation for managing taxpayer accounts to achieve the IRS modernization vision. The CADE consists of databases and related applications that will replace the existing IRS Master File processing systems, which are the official IRS repository of taxpayer information. It is a critical building block in the IRS Modernization Program that will enable the development of subsequent modernized systems to improve customer service and compliance.
The IRS deployed CADE Release 2 for the 2007 Filing Season. Release 2 added the ability to process U.S. Individual Income Tax Returns (Form 1040) that include Itemized Deductions (Schedule A), Interest and Ordinary Dividends (Schedule B), and Credit for the Elderly or the Disabled (Schedule R); the Head of Household filing status; and capabilities to handle the Telephone Excise Tax Refund. Overall, increased volumes of tax return information were accepted and posted accurately to CADE accounts during the 2007 Filing Season. The IRS successfully posted approximately 11 million tax returns to the CADE and generated approximately $11.6 billion in refunds from March through August 2007.
CADE Release 3 introduced additional capabilities for the 2008 Filing Season. It added the ability to (1) generate notices to taxpayers about account adjustment activities due to mathematical errors on the tax return, (2) split a taxpayer’s refund in any proportion and directly deposit the funds among two or three different financial institution accounts, (3) update a taxpayer’s account with an address change, and (4) process Child and Dependent Care Expenses (Form 2441) and the Earned Income Credit (Schedule EIC). The IRS reported that the CADE had posted approximately 21.1 million returns and generated approximately $32.6 billion in refunds as of March 28, 2008.
Additional tax returns have been added to the Modernized e-File project
The Modernization Program implemented Release 4 of its Modernized e-File project in January 2007. Release 4 added the U.S. Return of Partnership Income (Form 1065) and the U.S. Return of Income for Electing Large Partnerships (Form 1065-B) as well as Federal/State Single Point Filing System access for partnership returns.
Modernized e-File Release 5 expanded electronic filing (e-File) for Calendar Year 2008 with the ability to process U.S. Income Tax Return of a Foreign Corporation (1120-F). Release 5 also has the ability to process the Annual Electronic Filing Requirement for Small Exempt Organizations – Form 990-N (e-Postcard). The Pension Protection Act of 2006[8] requires charities with $25,000 or less in gross receipts to electronically file the new Form 990-N.
The first release of the Account Management Services system has been delivered
The first release of the Account Management Services system was deployed in October 2007. This release supports instant address change capability in the CADE and enables faster notice processing for taxpayers with mathematical errors on their tax returns.
The deployment of the Account Management Services system shows that the IRS can be successful when it follows its systems development and management guidance. These successes can generally be attributed to project teams implementing and adhering to Enterprise Life Cycle guidelines. The Account Management Services system project team developed required deliverables and work products, completed the detailed project release designs on time, formulated a manageable scope and realistic completion dates, and in a timely manner completed detailed release designs of a manageable scope.
Improvements have been made in contract negotiation and management practices
The IRS has further enhanced the management and capabilities of the Modernization Program by improving contract negotiation and management practices. Specifically, the Modernization and Information Technology Services (MITS) organization and the Office of Procurement have improved stakeholder involvement in pre-negotiation sessions and tracking pre-negotiation issues, obtained independent Federal Government cost estimates, improved negotiation priorities and strategies, and awarded task orders in a timely manner.
Efforts of the
The Modernization Program has progressed more effectively with the Enterprise Services organization assuming the role of Modernization Program integrator and with the development of the Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy as a map for future development.
The
The Enterprise Services organization provides services and functions that include both process and program areas such as governance, methodologies, requirements management, and planning for information technology portfolio investment decisions, as well as technical areas such as the enterprise architecture, technical standards, infrastructure, and systems engineering.
The Enterprise Services organization is divided into two component organizations. The Business Integration organization provides
integrated process architectures, solutions, services, and standards at an
enterprise level to enable business transformation. The Systems Integration organization develops
the architecture and infrastructure strategy and standards, which includes providing
engineering and architecture support to selected projects and supporting the
business and information technology infrastructure modernization objectives and
projects.
The Business Integration organization’s Business Rules and Requirements
Management office is beginning to provide benefits to the Modernization
Program. The Business Rules and Requirements
Management office’s mission is to provide the IRS with a quality requirements
baseline that reflects the needs of the business and its customers and results
in the deployment of solutions that meet those needs.
The IRS
created the Business Rules Requirements Management office to address the
challenges of capturing and managing IRS business solutions requirements, and
aligning those requirements with business strategy and needs.
The Business Rules and Requirements
Management office’s core services focus on delivering business redesign, rules
and requirements, and business solution architecture products. It also provides Business Analysis continuity
throughout the Enterprise Life Cycle, with standards and practices providing
the overall foundation for all services.
The Business Rules and Requirements Management office has benefited the
Modernization Program by:
Over the past year, the IRS has also made advances in incorporating the Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy into the framework of how it does business. The Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy supports the fulfillment of the IRS mission and strategic goals by establishing a 5-year plan that drives information technology investment decisions based on priorities around modernizing front-line tax administration and supporting technical infrastructure. The Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy leverages existing systems and new development to build information technology capabilities, optimize capacity, manage program costs, and deliver business value on an incremental and frequent basis.
The Information
Technology Modernization
Vision and Strategy is an important component of the IRS Strategic Plan.
In its second year of implementing the Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy, the IRS focused on expanding business scope and adding two new focus areas – Internal Management and Security and Privacy. The focus areas were further defined to address cross-cutting technical opportunities to deliver base products and services, such as end-user support, networks, and storage.
In
addition, the IRS established investment decision
support services that provided an increased confidence level and stakeholder
engagement between the business operating divisions and the MITS organization. The processes centered on developing a
well-defined business capability, designing a technical solution concept, and
estimating project life cycle and defining operational and maintenance costs.
The
IRS is addressing program weaknesses and barriers through the Highest Priority
Initiatives process
IRS executives and managers used the Highest
Priority Initiatives process to identify and seek resolution for the most
significant issues facing the Modernization Program. IRS executives and senior managers are
appointed to oversee the plans to resolve each of the Highest Priority
Initiatives, and progress is reported monthly.
New initiatives are identified every 6 months. This process is in its eighth 6-month cycle
and was expanded to include initiatives affecting the entire MITS
organization. From August 2005 to
February 2008, the IRS resolved a total of 92 of the identified Highest Priority
Initiatives, with 42 items currently in process.
Improvements in the management of the Modernization Program
have contributed to the IRS’ increased success in implementing modernization projects
and in meeting cost and schedule commitments for most deliverables. Specifically, as of March 2008, reported
project costs and completion dates showed that, since May 2007, 19 (95 percent)
of the 20 associated project milestones that were scheduled for completion were
completed within 10 percent of cost estimates, and 18 (90 percent) of the 20 milestones
were delivered within 10 percent of schedule estimates. See Appendix VI for detailed project cost and
schedule variance analysis.
Significant Barriers Continue to Challenge the Successful Completion of the Modernization Program
While steady progress and improvements have been made to the Modernization Program in the past year, the IRS and its contractors must still overcome significant barriers in successfully implementing Program goals. These barriers include:
Funding for the Modernization Program has generally decreased
As the Modernization Program has advanced, its funding has generally decreased. In Fiscal Year 2000, the Program received $414 million for contractors, plus approximately $12 million for internal IRS costs related to modernization. In Fiscal Year 2008, the Program will receive $267 million, consisting of $222 million for contractors and $45 million for IRS labor costs. The preliminary budget for Fiscal Year 2009 shows a reduction of 16.6 percent to $222.6 million, consisting of $179.2 million for contractors and $43.4 million for IRS labor costs.[9]
Early in the Modernization Program, the IRS struggled to effectively manage a large portfolio of projects. Due to weaknesses in systems development processes and management, modernization projects were continually delivered late and over budget. This prompted both the TIGTA and the Government Accountability Office to recommend reducing the scope of Modernization Program efforts to enable more effective management. The IRS agreed and reduced the scope and pace of the Program, which led to a significantly decreased modernization budget beginning in Fiscal Year 2005. Although the Program has progressed, improved overall program management, and is looking to increase the scope of its projects, the budget to fund these projects has generally decreased over the past several fiscal years. See Appendix V for more details.
Budget reductions have required Modernization Program management to continually adjust the scope of the portfolio and modernization project release schedules. In some instances, management has had to defer or even forgo project capabilities because sufficient funding was not available. For example, funding shortfalls caused the IRS to forgo development of significant capabilities for the Modernized e-File Integration project. These capabilities would have allowed the IRS business operating divisions to better utilize the Modernized e-File system for enforcement activities. Because the Modernized e-File system is not being used to the extent originally planned, the intended benefits to the business operating divisions are not being achieved. As a result of the data access limitations, the Large and Mid-Size Business Division and the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division are using their own systems to access Modernized e-File filed tax return data.[10]
A second project, the Enterprise Return Retrieval system, was subsequently planned to deliver the capabilities the Modernized e-File Integration project could not. However, this project was not funded for Fiscal Year 2008.
Modernization Program system development and management processes are not always implemented consistently
The Modernization Program could improve its effectiveness and efficiency through closer adherence to established guidelines such as the Enterprise Life Cycle guidelines and its related key processes, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Our audits found that the Modernization Program did not consistently implement Enterprise Life Cycle guidelines, including project management and requirements management activities.
Project management is the discipline applied to help ensure orderly and controlled initiation, planning, execution, and implementation of a project. Effective project management includes completing the requirements of the milestone processes and products before advancing through the systems development life cycle. Project management processes were not applied consistently throughout the Modernization Program. For example, the CADE project has shown a pattern of deferring project requirements to later releases and missing release deployment dates since the beginning of the project. CADE project requirements from each release have been deferred, and the project has missed target dates because the IRS and the PRIME contractor agreed to an unrealistic scope of work and did not follow the Enterprise Life Cycle Preliminary Design Phase guidelines.[11]
In contrast, the Account Management Services project’s success can be attributed to the efforts of the project team following Enterprise Life Cycle guidelines, developing required work products, completing detailed release designs on time, and formulating a manageable scope.[12]
The Modernization Program has continued to struggle with requirements management processes. For example, an audit of the Modernized e-File project found that the project requirements were not traced between the System Requirements Report and the requirements traceability verification matrices.[13] The Enterprise Life Cycle directs project teams to verify that the contractor is maintaining the traceability of project requirements for applications developed throughout the project life cycle, including ensuring that each requirement is mapped to its higher level requirement. The Software Engineering Institute’s Capability Maturity Model Integration provides that a project should maintain bi-directional traceability between source requirements and all product requirements. Without complete bi-directional traceability, it is difficult for the IRS to assess the adequacy of requirements development and testing activities. In addition, there is no assurance that the requirements expected and approved to be deployed are the requirements that are actually deployed.
In addition, since the beginning of the CADE project’s development, we have identified a trend by the project team of deferring requirements to later releases and missing release deployment dates. For example, the Release 2 requirements were revised based on the contracted goal of processing 33 million tax returns during the 2007 Filing Season and did not consider the complexity of the programming involved for processing these returns.[14]
The Federal Acquisition Regulation was not consistently followed
The Federal Acquisition Regulation is a set of policies and procedures for procurements by and for the use of Federal Government agencies. They include solicitation and selection of contract sources, awards, financing, performance and administration, and technical and management functions.
We issued a report in May 2005[15] indicating the actions necessary for the Modernization Program to fully realize the potential of performance-based contracting. We made recommendations for improvement in the areas of (1) firm fixed-price task orders, (2) contract negotiation practices, and (3) monitoring contractor performance.
Our 2007 report[16] showed that weaknesses in implementing controls to manage contractor performance and accountability remained. For example, a review of Modernization Program contracting activities found that further improvements could be made in selecting and documenting appropriate contract types by (1) balancing risk between the IRS and its contractors, (2) ensuring that incentives and disincentives are included in task orders when appropriate, and (3) improving documentation to justify the contract type selected.
In addition, improvements could be made to contract negotiation and management practices by (1) improving the preparation and use of independent Federal Government cost estimates, (2) eliminating the use of Memoranda of Understanding, (3) consistently preparing and using pre-award timelines, and (4) monitoring contractors’ performance by consistently including measurable performance standards in task orders and documenting contractors’ performance against the standards.
Ineffective contract management has contributed to delays in project and release deliverables, inadequate deliverables, and increased development costs. The absence of sufficient contract negotiation and monitoring provides opportunities for contractor waste, inefficiencies, and accounting irregularities. For example, a task order audit determined that the contractor’s assignment of personnel was not closely monitored by the IRS. As a result, the audit identified approximately $3.4 million in questionable contractor charges.
Without close adherence to established guidelines such as the Enterprise Life Cycle guidelines and its related key processes and the Federal Acquisition Regulation, the IRS cannot efficiently and effectively manage the Modernization Program. Because the IRS did not adhere to established guidelines, the Program has experienced delays in project completion, incurred increased development costs, and delivered projects and releases with fewer capabilities than originally planned.
The Modernization Program should continue to be designated a material weakness
The IRS continues to encounter barriers to delivering a successful modernization. To address these barriers, the IRS’ corrective responses to TIGTA and Government Accountability Office recommendations are evaluated and submitted as Highest Priority Initiatives candidates, when appropriate, and are selected at the discretion of executive leadership. In this manner, the IRS continues to execute the Highest Priority Initiatives process and include Modernization Program corrective actions from TIGTA and Government Accountability Office reports.
In the past year, several Highest Priority Initiatives related to TIGTA recommendations were identified for action. The IRS continues to deliver monthly Highest Priority Initiatives reports and plans to use this process to eventually downgrade the Modernization Program material weakness. Although this process is in place, we believe that, until the IRS is able to show consistent progress and improvement in the management of its Modernization Program and adequately address past TIGTA and Government Accountability Office recommendations, the Modernization Program should continue to be considered a material weakness.
The Federal Managers’ Financial Integrity Act of 1982[17] requires each Federal Government agency to prepare for Congress and the President an annual report that identifies material weaknesses and the agency’s corrective action plans and schedules. Since 1995, the IRS has identified and reported systems modernization as a material weakness. Office of Management and Budget Circular A-123[18] defines a material weakness as any condition an agency head determines to be significant enough to be reported outside the agency. To maintain the high level of attention, focus, and accountability, we believe the Modernization Program should remain a material weakness for the IRS. Appendix VII presents an analysis of recommendations from TIGTA reports related to the Modernization Program material weakness. Appendix VIII presents a summary of the TIGTA reports issued since July 2007 that assessed the performance and progress of the Modernization Program.
Appendix I
Detailed Objective,
Scope, and Methodology
The overall objective of this review was to assess the progress of the IRS’ Modernization Program for Fiscal Year 2008, as required by the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.[19] To accomplish this objective, we:
I. Determined the current condition of the Modernization Program.
A. Reviewed TIGTA reports issued from July 2007 through April 2008[20] and 6 previous Modernization Program annual assessment reports (issued in Fiscal Years 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007).[21]
B. Reviewed recent IRS Oversight Board documents to identify current IRS Oversight Board issues and concerns.
C. Reviewed Government Accountability Office reports relevant to Modernization Program activities.
D. Determined the TIGTA audit recommendations related to the Modernization Program material weakness with incomplete IRS corrective actions.
II. Determined the status and condition of the Modernization Program reported by the IRS by reviewing the following documentation:
A. The Systems Modernization Material Weakness Plan.
B. The Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy documents.
C. The Business Systems Modernization Expenditure Plans, including an evaluation of any cost, schedule, and functionality variances. We did not validate the information provided by the IRS on the cost, scope, and business value of the Modernization Program.
D. The IRS’ Highest Priority Initiatives status reports for the Modernization Program.
E. IRS Modernization Has Delivered Real Business Value status reports on business value released into production.
Appendix II
Major Contributors to This Report
Margaret E. Begg, Assistant Inspector General for Audit (Information Systems Programs)
Scott A. Macfarlane, Director
Edward A. Neuwirth, Audit Manager
Glen J. Rhoades, Senior Auditor
Louis V. Zullo, Senior Auditor
Charlene L. Elliston, Auditor
Appendix III
Commissioner C
Office of the Commissioner – Attn: Chief of Staff C
Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support OS
Commissioner, Wage and Investment Division SE:W
Associate Chief Information Officer, Applications Development OS:CIO:AD
Associate
Chief Information Officer,
Director,
Office of Program Evaluation and Risk Analysis RAS:O
Deputy Associate Chief Information Officer, Applications Development OS:CIO:AD
Deputy Associate Chief Information Officer, Business Integration OS:CIO:ES:BI
Deputy Associate Chief Information Officer, Systems Integration OS:CIO:ES:SI
Director, Stakeholder Management OS:CIO:SM
Chief Counsel CC
National Taxpayer Advocate TA
Director, Office of Legislative Affairs CL:LA
Office of Internal
Control OS:CFO:CPIC:IC
Audit
Liaisons:
Associate Chief Information
Officer, Applications Development
OS:CIO:AD
Director, Program Oversight
Office OS:CIO:SM:
Appendix IV
Enterprise Life
Cycle Overview
The Enterprise Life Cycle[22] is the IRS’ standard approach to business change and information systems initiatives. It is a collection of program and project management best practices designed to manage business change in a successful and repeatable manner. The Enterprise Life Cycle addresses large and small projects developed internally and by contractors.
The Enterprise Life Cycle includes such requirements as:
·
Development of
and conformance to an enterprise architecture.
·
Improving
business processes prior to automation.
·
Use of
prototyping and commercial software, where possible.
·
Obtaining early
benefit by implementing solutions in multiple releases.
·
Financial
justification, budgeting, and reporting of project status.
In addition, the Enterprise Life Cycle improves the IRS’ ability to manage changes to the enterprise; estimate the cost of changes; and engineer, develop, and maintain systems effectively. Figure 1 provides an overview of the layers, paths, phases, and milestones (shown as “MS” in Figure 1) within the Enterprise Life Cycle Framework.
Figure
1:
Figure
1 was removed due to its size. To see
Figure 1, please go to the Adobe PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public
Web Page.
The Enterprise Life
Cycle is a framework for organizing and using IRS directives, processes,
procedures, templates, and standards to accomplish business change. It is organized as a set of six interacting
layers.
·
The Management Layer specifies how to plan
and control business change programs, projects, acquisitions, and solutions
throughout the Enterprise Life Cycle.
·
The Governance Layer specifies additional
controls imposed from outside the project or program.
·
The Solution Life Cycle Layer specifies
what should be done, but not how to do it.
·
The Solution Layer manages the solution as
it is produced, including providing standards for consistent solution
specification and formal review of solution content. This Layer provides control over work
products that may be produced by multiple internal and external developers
using differing methodologies.
·
The Methodology Layer details how to do the
work and specifies a unique set of work products to be produced. Specific methodologies are not part of the Enterprise
Life Cycle Framework.
·
The Specialty Areas Layer provides
additional guidance for areas of particular importance within the IRS. These areas include Enterprise Integration,
Test, and Evaluation; Business Rules Harvesting and Management; Transition
Management; Enterprise Architecture; Capital Planning and Investment Control;
Security and Privacy; and Requirements Development and Management.
A path specifies a
unique “philosophy” or orientation for performing the work. Although the Enterprise Life Cycle specifies
a standard for the work required to produce and operate business change
solutions, there are multiple ways to approach and accomplish the required
work. Paths are like alternate roads,
each of which crosses different terrain, but all of which lead to the same
destination. The Enterprise Life Cycle
provides five distinct paths or approaches to developing systems:
·
The Large Custom Path is for large
projects.
·
The Small Custom Path is for small
projects.
·
The Commercial-Off-the-Shelf Path is a
commercial software-based approach.
·
The Joint Application Development/Rapid
Application Development Path is a highly accelerated, prototyping-based
approach for very small, stand-alone solutions or solution components.
·
The Iterative Custom Path is a hybrid
approach that combines elements of the other approaches.
A phase is a broad segment of
work encompassing activities of similar scope, nature, and detail and providing
a natural breakpoint in the life cycle.
Each phase begins with a kickoff meeting and ends with an executive
management decision point (called a milestone) at which IRS executives make
“go/no-go” decisions for continuation of a project. Project funding decisions are often
associated with milestones.
Figure
2:
|
Phase |
General Nature of Work |
Concluding Milestone |
|
Vision and
Strategy/ |
High-level direction setting. This is the only phase for enterprise
planning projects. |
0 |
|
Project Initiation
Phase |
Startup of development projects. |
1 |
|
Domain Architecture
Phase |
Specification of the operating concept,
requirements, and structure of the solution.
|
2 |
|
Preliminary
Design Phase |
Preliminary design of all solution
components. |
3 |
|
Detailed
Design Phase |
Detailed design of solution components. |
4A |
|
System Development
Phase |
Coding, integration, testing, and
certification of solutions. |
4B |
|
System Deployment
Phase |
Expanding availability of the solution
to all target users. This is usually
the last phase for development projects. |
5 |
|
Operations
and Maintenance Phase |
Ongoing management of operational
systems. |
System Retirement |
Source:
The
Appendix V
Figure 1 depicts cumulative funding received by the Modernization Program for contractor costs.
Figure 1: Modernization
Program Funding Timeline (Dollars are cumulative)
Figure 1 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 1, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Figure 2 depicts the funding received annually by the Modernization Program for program management and development of business and infrastructure projects.
Figure 2: Modernization
Program Funding by Fiscal Year
Figure 2 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 2, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Figure 3 depicts the cumulative funding received by the Modernization Program for non-contractor costs of managing Modernization Program activities. The IRS stated that approximately 25 percent of its non-contractor budget since Fiscal Year 2001 has been used to support non-Modernization Program activities in the IRS.
Figure 3: Non-contractor Modernization Funding Timeline
by Fiscal Year (Dollars are cumulative)
Figure 3 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 3, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Figure 4 depicts the funding received annually by the
Modernization Program for non-contractor costs of managing Program activities.
Figure 4: Non-contractor Modernization Costs by Fiscal
Year
Figure 4 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 4, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Figure 5 depicts the Modernization Program funding for non-contractor and external (contractor) costs to manage Program activities.
Figure 5:
Internal and External Modernization Program Costs (in millions)
Figure 5 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 5, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Appendix VI
Project Cost and Schedule Variance Analysis
Table 1 presents the cost and
schedule variance for Modernization Program project releases delivered since
May 2007 and currently in progress.
Table 1:
Modernization Project Cost and Schedule Variance Summary
|
Release |
Scheduled |
Milestone |
Cost Variance (Dollars) |
Cost Variance (Percent) |
Schedule Variance (Days) |
Schedule Variance
(Percent) |
|
|
CADE |
|||||||
|
2.2 |
June 27, 2007 |
4 |
$3,777,000 |
15% |
123 |
65% |
|
|
3 |
September 26, 2007 |
2-3 |
$0 |
0% |
214 |
152% |
|
|
3.1 |
November 20, 2007 |
4 |
$0 |
0% |
-7 |
-2% |
|
|
3.2 |
February 27, 2008 |
4 |
$0 |
0% |
-1 |
0% |
|
|
4 |
February 13, 2008 |
2-3 |
$0 |
0% |
-10 |
-3% |
|
|
4.1 |
August 31, 2008 |
4 |
$0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
|
5 |
September 30, 2008 |
2-3 |
$0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
|
Account Management Services |
|||||||
|
1.1 |
May 3, 2007 |
4a |
$0 |
0% |
3 |
5% |
|
|
1.1 |
September 26, 2007 |
4b |
$0 |
0% |
-1 |
-1% |
|
|
1.1 |
January 29, 2008 |
5 |
$0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
|
1.2 |
March 13, 2007 |
4a |
$0 |
0% |
-2 |
-2% |
|
|
1.2 |
February 13, 2008 |
4b |
$0 |
0% |
11 |
9% |
|
|
1.2 |
November 11, 2008 |
5 |
$0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
|
1.3 |
July 24, 2007 |
2-3 |
$0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
|
1.3 |
February 13, 2008 |
4a |
$0 |
0% |
1 |
1% |
|
|
1.3 |
November 11, 2008 |
4b |
$0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
|
2.1 |
April 15, 2008 |
3 |
$0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
|
|
Filing and Payment Compliance |
|||||||
|
1.2 |
September 27, 2007 |
5 |
$340,000 |
10% |
-1 |
-1% |
|
|
Modernized e-File |
|||||||
|
5 |
April 2, 2008 |
4a-5 |
$1,300,000 |
10% |
2 |
1% |
|
|
6 |
May 6, 2008 |
3 |
$0 |
0% |
19 |
10% |
|
Source: IRS Applications Development organization –
Resources Management office.
Appendix VII
Open Recommendations Related to
Modernization Program Material Weaknesses
Table 1 lists TIGTA audit recommendations with current IRS open corrective actions related to the Modernization Program material weakness.
Table
1: TIGTA Recommendations Related to
Modernization Program Material Weakness
|
The
Modernization, Information Technology and Security Services Organization
Needs to Take Further Action to Complete Its Human Capital Strategy (Reference
Number 2003-20-209, dated September 2003) |
|
|
2003-20-209 Finding 1, Recommendation 1 |
To
ensure the MITS organization has sufficient data to determine human capital
demands, the Chief Information officer (CIO) needs to support the Director,
Management Services, to work with offices throughout the MITS organization to
identify the human capital demand. The
demand includes information to adequately plan the number, location, and
assignment schedule of human capital assets for existing information systems
(from owners in the Information Technology Services organization) and future MITS
organization operations (from owners in the Business Systems Modernization
Program). Due Date: December 31, 2010. |
|
2003-20-209 Finding 2, Recommendation 1 |
To
ensure the MITS organization has adequate staffing to meet its needs, the CIO
should charge the Director, Management Services, to develop detailed hiring
and retention plans. These plans
should consider staff position “return on investment” as a consideration for
determining the type of talent to recruit or retain and should be
incorporated into the MITS organization’s human capital strategy with
relevant links to its budget. Recruiting:
Prioritize the most critical skill
needs and position locations with project development, deployment, implementation,
and operation schedules. Proceed with
hiring specific skills based on decisions to recruit for the subject position
with either fully trained or trainable talent or through an internship
position. Retention:
Identify and compile retention
incentives into a plan to maintain the MITS organization talent pool. Due Date:
December 31, 2010. |
|
Risks
Are Mounting as the Integrated Financial System Project Team Strives to Meet an
Aggressive Implementation Date (Reference Number 2004-20-001, dated
October 2003) |
|
|
2004-20-001 Finding 2, Recommendation 1 |
To
ensure a high-quality system is delivered, the CIO should ensure the disaster
recovery environment is completely built out and tested as soon as possible. Due Date:
December 31, 2010. |
|
The Office of Release Management Can Improve
Controls for Modernization Program Coordination (Reference
Number 2004-20-157, dated September 2004) |
|
|
2004-20-157 Finding 1, Recommendation 1 |
To
help provide clear direction in the development of the Modernization Program,
the CIO should determine whether and how the Business Systems Modernization Office
will fulfill the Modernization Program integrator role and document the
related responsibilities and processes.
Due Date: December 31, 2010. |
|
The
Business Systems Modernization Program Has Achieved Mixed Success in
Addressing Weaknesses Identified in Internal and External Studies (Reference
Number 2006-20-003, dated November 2005) |
|
|
2006-20-003 Finding 1, Recommendation 2 |
To
ensure study weaknesses and previous recommendations concerning
change/configuration management are addressed, the Associate CIO, Enterprise
Services, should create an overall plan that includes defined tasks,
responsible individuals, and estimated completion dates for implementing the
standardized configuration management toolset. Due Date:
December 31, 2010. |
|
The
Electronic Fraud Detection System Redesign Failure Resulted in Fraudulent
Returns and Refunds Not Being Identified (Reference Number 2006-20-108, dated
August 9, 2006) |
|
|
2006-20-108 Finding 3, Recommendation 4 |
The
CIO should defer additional work on the Web Electronic Fraud Detection System
until the IRS decides who will perform the Electronic Fraud Detection System
work. If some or all of the work will
transfer to other business units, the CIO should ensure their requirements
are identified before initiating a contract for further development of the
Web Electronic Fraud Detection System.
The contract should be opened to competition. Due Date:
December 31, 2010. |
|
The Modernization and Information Technology
Services Organization’s Revised Post Implementation Review Procedure Can Be
Improved (Reference Number 2007-20-001, dated October 26, 2006) |
|
|
2007-20-001 Finding 1, Recommendation 1 |
The
CIO should direct the Program Performance Management office to develop a
schedule to perform Post Implementation Reviews for releases deployed and to
identify and obtain staffing resource commitments needed from the Program
Performance Management office, the Office of Program Evaluation and Risk
Analysis, and appropriate business unit representatives to effectively
execute the Post Implementation Reviews.
The CIO should also direct the Program Performance Management office
to eliminate the requirement to perform Post Reviews of milestone completion
activities after milestone exits, with the option of identifying any lessons
learned for further project progress through the Milestone Exit Reviews. Due Date:
March 1, 2010. |
|
2007-20-001 Finding 1, Recommendation 2 |
The
CIO should direct the Program Performance Management office to implement a
procedure to control Post Implementation Review results that ensures
appropriate executives and decision makers have access to these documents. Due Date:
March 1, 2010. |
|
2007-20-001 Finding 1, Recommendation 3 |
The
CIO should direct the Program Performance Management office to identify
skills and abilities desired for Post Implementation Review team members and
ensure team assignments consider these qualifications. The Program Performance Management office
should develop a training guide for Post Implementation Review team members
to provide them with an understanding of the purpose, objectives, and
processes of the Post Implementation Review.
Due Date: March 1, 2010. |
|
The
Modernization and Information Technology Services Organization Can Improve
Its Budget Formulation, Execution, and Review Processes (Reference Number 2007-20-064, dated May 9, 2007) |
|
|
2007-20-064 Finding 1, Recommendation 1 |
The
CIO should implement a process to develop the entire MITS organization budget
in line with the Information Technology Modernization Vision and Strategy’s
rolling 5-year prioritized plan. The
budget process should consider organizational goals for each of the MITS organization
components and include costs for operations and maintenance of existing
computer systems, telecommunication systems, and other programs such as end-user
support and help desk activities. Due
Date: October 1, 2008. |
|
2007-20-064 Finding 2, Recommendation 1 |
The
CIO should ensure (1) the draft Budget Cycle procedures are approved and
implemented timely and (2) the Financial Management Services organization
supplements the budget formulation processes with detailed procedures
documenting Financial Management Services organization staff duties and
responsibilities for soliciting, receiving, reviewing, and reporting MITS
organization budget estimates. Due
date: January 1, 2008. |
|
2007-20-064 Finding 3, Recommendation 1 |
The
CIO should ensure (1) the draft Budget Cycle document is approved timely and
the spending review procedures are implemented and (2) the Financial
Management Services organization supplements the spending review reporting
with additional procedures that identify Fund Center Changes necessary to
realign funds in response to spending review results. Due date: January 1, 2008. |
|
The
Modernized e-File Project Can Improve Its Management of Requirements (Reference
Number 2007-20-099, dated July 9, 2007) |
|
|
2007-20-099 Finding 1, Recommendation 1 |
To complete the previous corrective action, the CIO should ensure the Modernized e-File System Requirements Report and Release 4 requirements traceability verification matrices are updated to include traceability to valid requirement numbers, to meet the Enterprise Life Cycle provisions for managing requirements. This control will provide assurance about the development of all approved requirements. Due Date: February 1, 2009. |
|
Vital
Decisions Must Be Made to Ensure Successful Implementation of Customer
Account Data Engine Capabilities (Reference
Number 2007-20-080, dated July 13, 2007) |
|
|
2007-20-080 Finding 3, Recommendation 1 |
The
CIO should partner with the Wage and Investment Division Business
Modernization Office to jointly review alternative design solutions and
identify process improvements for the CADE. Alternative design solutions, such as
delaying processing of some tax returns on extremely high-volume processing
days or obtaining additional computer resources on an interim basis, need to
be explored to ensure the CADE can operate as efficiently and effectively as
possible. Due Date: July 1, 2008. |
|
While
Improvements Continue in Contract Negotiation Methods and Management
Practices, Inconsistencies Need to Be Addressed (Reference Number 2007-20-123, dated July 27, 2007) |
|
|
2007-20-123 Finding 2, Recommendation 1 |
The
CIO and the Chief, Agency-Wide Shared Services, should collect and review
lessons learned from the use of independent estimates to determine whether
independent estimates can become a consistently more useful negotiations tool
(e.g., ensuring estimates are obtained at the appropriate time). Due Date:
March 1, 2009. |
|
2007-20-123 Finding 3, Recommendation 2 |
The
CIO and the Chief, Agency-Wide Shared Services, should ensure improvements
and training opportunities for the use of performance standards are identified
and coordinated with other IRS organizations to encourage the use of
performance standards for systems development task orders outside of the
control of the MITS organization. Due
Date: June 15, 2008. |
|
2007-20-123 Finding 3, Recommendation 4 |
The
CIO and the Chief, Agency-Wide Shared Services, should collect and
disseminate guidance for documenting contractor performance and coordinate
with other IRS organizations to communicate the importance of documenting
contractor performance for systems development task orders outside the
control of the MITS organization. Due
Date: June 15, 2008. |
|
Improvements
to the Modernized e-File System Will Help Provide Intended Benefits to the
Internal Revenue Service and Taxpayers (Reference
Number 2008-20-122, dated June 18, 2008) |
|
|
2008-20-122 Finding 1, Recommendation 1 |
The
Commissioner, Wage and Investment Division, should require the Director,
Submission Processing, and the Director, Electronic Tax Administration to
develop a formal process for identifying, reporting, and resolving Modernized
e-File system application processing issues that require subsequent tax
return and account adjustment activity.
This control process will provide a means for identifying significant
Modernized e-File system tax return issues and provide the IRS with the
ability to develop corrective actions.
This control can also be used to notify IRS staff of processing issues
to enable appropriate compliance actions.
Due Date: March 15, 2009. |
|
2008-20-122 Finding 2, Recommendation 3 |
The Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support and
the Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement should ensure the
business operating divisions and the MITS organization coordinate the
capabilities of the Technology and Data Integration Plan initiative and the
Enterprise Return Retrieval system into the Information Technology
Modernization Vision and Strategy.
Coordinating the Technology and Data Integration Plan and Enterprise
Return Retrieval system with the Information Technology Modernization Vision and
Strategy will help allow the IRS to achieve enterprise-wide capabilities for
the identification, control, and analysis of electronic tax return and
taxpayer account information for customer service and compliance purposes. Due Date:
December 1, 2008. |
Appendix VIII
Recent Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration Reports on the Internal Revenue Service’s Modernization Program
Table 1 lists TIGTA reports related to the IRS Modernization Program issued from July 2007 through April 2008 and the associated findings, recommendations, and IRS corrective actions.
Table 1:
Recent TIGTA Reports, Findings, and Corrective Actions
Source:
TIGTA audit reports issued from July 2007 through April 2008.
Appendix
IX
|
Term |
Definition |
|
Account Management Services |
This project will modernize the capability to collect, view, retrieve, and manage taxpayer information. |
|
Best Practice |
A technique or methodology that, through experience and research, has proven to reliably lead to a desired result. |
|
Business Rule |
A statement that defines or constrains some aspect of the
business. |
|
Business Rules Harvesting |
A general term used to broadly describe the entire set of
activities involved in gathering, formalizing, analyzing, and validating
business rules for a particular scope. |
|
Customer Account Data
Engine |
The foundation for managing taxpayer accounts in the IRS
modernization plan. It will consist of
databases and related applications that will replace the existing IRS Master
File processing systems and will include applications for daily posting,
settlement, maintenance, refund processing, and issue detection for taxpayer
tax account and return data. |
|
Deferral |
An approved request for verification of a requirement or
set of requirements to be moved to another phase of testing. |
|
Electronic Fraud Detection
System |
The primary information system used to support the IRS Criminal Investigation Division’s Questionable Refund Program, which is a nationwide program established in January 1997 to detect and stop fraudulent and fictitious claims for refunds on income tax returns. |
|
|
Supports tax processing and information management through a data processing and telecommunications infrastructure. |
|
|
Processes for integrating multiple components of a
solution and conducting various types and levels of testing on the solution. |
|
|
A structured business systems development method that requires the preparation of specific work products during different phases of the development process. |
|
Executive Steering
Committee |
Oversees investments, including validating major investment business requirements and ensuring that enabling technologies are defined, developed, and implemented. |
|
Filing and Payment
Compliance |
This project will provide support for detecting, scoring,
and working nonfiler cases (filing compliance) and delinquency cases (payment
compliance). |
|
Filing Season |
The period from January through
mid-April when most individual income tax returns are filed. |
|
Firm Fixed-Price Task Order |
A contract with a set price that is not subject to any
adjustment because of cost overruns incurred by the contractor. |
|
Forms 1040, 1040EZ, and 1040A |
The series of IRS forms that include individual income tax
returns. |
|
Information Technology
Modernization Vision and Strategy |
A 5-year plan that drives investment decisions, addresses the priorities around modernizing front-line tax administration and supporting technical capabilities, and leverages existing systems (where possible) and new development (where necessary) to optimize capacity, manage program costs, and deliver business value on a more incremental and frequent basis. |
|
Infrastructure |
The fundamental structure of a system or organization. The basic, fundamental architecture of any system (electronic, mechanical, social, political, etc.) determines how it functions and how flexible it is to meet future requirements. |
|
Logical Design |
Describes the functions required of a system; that is,
what is to be done, not how it will be done.
Logical design is concerned with the processes to be performed. |
|
Master File |
The IRS database that stores various types of taxpayer
account information. This database
includes individual, business, and employee plans and exempt organizations
data. |
|
Milestone |
The “go/no-go” decision point in a project and is
sometimes associated with funding approval to proceed. |
|
Modernized e-File |
The modernized, web-based platform for filing approximately 330 IRS forms electronically, beginning with the U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return (Form 1120), U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation (Form 1120S), and Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax (Form 990). |
|
PRIME Contractor |
The Computer
Sciences Corporation, which heads an alliance of leading technology companies
brought together to assist with the IRS’ efforts to modernize its computer
systems and related information technology. |
|
Release |
A specific edition of software. |
|
Requirement Traceability
Verification Matrix |
Provides the status of how each requirement is being satisfied as it gets designed and implemented, as well as how the test components are developed, to verify the successful operation of each requirement. |
|
Return on Investment |
The net profit or loss in an accounting period divided by the capital investment used during the period, usually expressed as an annual percentage return. |
|
Systems Requirements Report |
Documents a feasible, quantified, verifiable set of requirements that define and scope the business system being developed by a project. |
|
Task Order |
An order for services placed against an established
contract. |
|
Transition Management |
Helps ensure that personnel and organizations are prepared
to receive, use, operate, and maintain the business processes and technology
provided by business change solutions. |
|
Vision and Strategy |
Translates the fundamental business strategy into a transformation strategy for business processes, information technology, and organizational change. |
Appendix X
Management’s Response to the Draft Report
The response was removed due to its size. To see the response, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
[1] Pub. L. No. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 2 U.S.C., 5 U.S.C. app., 16 U.S.C., 19 U.S.C., 22 U.S.C., 23 U.S.C., 26 U.S.C., 31 U.S.C., 38 U.S.C., and 49 U.S.C.).
[2] See Appendix IX for a glossary of terms.
[3] Pub. L. No. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 2 U.S.C., 5 U.S.C. app., 16 U.S.C., 19 U.S.C., 22 U.S.C., 23 U.S.C., 26 U.S.C., 31 U.S.C., 38 U.S.C., and 49 U.S.C.).
[4] See Appendix IX for a glossary of terms.
[5] Appendix IV presents an overview of the Enterprise Life Cycle.
[6] Appendix VIII presents the TIGTA reports used in formulating this Modernization Program assessment.
[7] Internal Revenue Service’s Fiscal Year 2008 Expenditure Plan (GAO-08-420, dated March 2008).
[8] Pub. L. 109–280, 120 Stat. 780.
[9] Appendix V presents an analysis of Modernization Program funding since its inception.
[10] Improvements to the Modernized e-File System Will Help Provide Intended Benefits to the Internal Revenue Service and Taxpayers (Reference Number 2008-20-122, dated June 18, 2008).
[11] Vital Decisions Must Be Made to Ensure Successful Implementation of Customer Account Data Engine Capabilities (Reference Number 2007-20-080, dated July 13, 2007).
[12] The Account Management Services Project Is Meeting Its Development Goals (Reference Number 2008-20-053, dated March 3, 2008).
[13] The Modernized e-File Project Can Improve Its Management of Requirements (Reference Number 2007-20-099, dated July 9, 2007).
[14] Vital Decisions Must Be Made to Ensure Successful Implementation of Customer Account Data Engine Capabilities (Reference Number 2007-20-080, dated July 13, 2007).
[15] While
Many Improvements Have Been Made, Continued Focus Is Needed to Improve Contract
Negotiations and
Fully Realize the Potential of Performance-Based Contracting (Reference Number 2005-20-083, dated May 2005).
[16] While Improvements Continue in Contract Negotiation Methods and Management Practices, Inconsistencies Need to Be Addressed (Reference Number 2007-20-123, July 27, 2007).
[17] 31 U.S.C. Sections 1105, 1113, 3512 (2000).
[18] Management's Responsibility for Internal Control, dated December 2004.
[19] Pub. L. No. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 2 U.S.C., 5 U.S.C. app., 16 U.S.C., 19 U.S.C., 22 U.S.C., 23 U.S.C., 26 U.S.C., 31 U.S.C., 38 U.S.C., and 49 U.S.C.).
[20] See Appendix VIII for a detailed list of recent TIGTA reports and associated findings.
[21] Annual Assessment of the Internal Revenue Service’s Business Systems Modernization Program (Reference Number 2002-20-189, dated September 2002); Annual Assessment of the Business Systems Modernization Program (Reference Number 2003-20-208, dated September 2003); Annual Assessment of the Business Systems Modernization Program (Reference Number 2004-20-107, dated June 2004); Annual Assessment of the Business Systems Modernization Program (Reference Number 2005-20-102, dated August 2005); Annual Assessment of the Business Systems Modernization Program (Reference Number 2006-20-102, dated June 2006); and Annual Assessment of the Business Systems Modernization Program (Reference Number 2007-20-121, dated August 24, 2007).
[22] See Appendix IX for a glossary of terms.